Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.26
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-15 22:31 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2011-10-08 10:59 (UTC)

@Det - two lines actually here - http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-October/021716.html

Det commented on 2011-10-08 10:15 (UTC)

No, there's no redundancy or regressions. That's not the point here at all. The governor _should_ be "performance" with the [core] kernel because the iso needs it. Also what the update log says is this: "fix archiso support and change back governor to performance as default". Just one line.

graysky commented on 2011-10-08 09:50 (UTC)

@Det - my goal is to match point-for-point the official ARCH package with the exception of the BFS/BFQ stuff. You might wanna open a flyspray on linux in [core] if you think you've identified some redundancy or regression in the packaging (note that I just pasted what was @ the svntogit link).

Det commented on 2011-10-08 09:45 (UTC)

Actually that's the same thing. The iso gets fixed _by_ changing the governor back (which basically doesn't concern this package at all anyway).

graysky commented on 2011-10-07 21:15 (UTC)

Bump to 3.0.6-2 http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/?id=cfd8c15885ef92b3c93e2c1742adccb092f65957 Notes from tpowa: *fix archiso support *change back governor to performance as default

feilen commented on 2011-10-06 21:46 (UTC)

@graysky Ah! So really I'm just telling you what I read from what you said. Hmm.

graysky commented on 2011-10-05 07:34 (UTC)

Thanks JB - kernel.org still shows the old info (even linuxnext is old). Must be they haven't gotten around to the content just yet.

jokerboy commented on 2011-10-05 07:21 (UTC)

http://lwn.net/Articles/461488/

graysky commented on 2011-10-05 01:21 (UTC)

For some reason, the devs are on 3.0.6 whereas kernel.org is on 3.0.4 but what the fuck. Update to 3.0.6-1. http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-October/021696.html

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 .. 307 Next › Last »