Package Details: aegisub-git 3.4.2.r61.08c084e16-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/aegisub-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: aegisub-git
Description: A general-purpose subtitle editor with ASS/SSA support
Upstream URL: http://www.aegisub.org
Licenses: BSD-3-Clause
Submitter: alucryd
Maintainer: arch1t3cht
Last Packager: arch1t3cht
Votes: 24
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2012-08-27 19:37 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-21 15:28 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 13 Next › Last »

alucryd commented on 2015-05-05 08:26 (UTC)

Nope, assdraw doesn't build, being 3 years old doesn't help. If somebody finds a way to make it compile, I'll gladly add it to this package.

<deleted-account> commented on 2015-05-03 18:36 (UTC)

Has it the package assdraw compiled with aegisub?

alucryd commented on 2014-04-05 13:44 (UTC)

Just pushed a git ffms2 snapshot in [community] which will solve the audio issue.

argo commented on 2014-04-05 01:00 (UTC)

alucryd: np. Another thing: AAC loading's currently broken with ffmpeg 2.2 and ffms 2.19, so for working audio we should either use ffms2-git or wait till FS#39748 got resolved.

alucryd commented on 2014-03-17 17:56 (UTC)

argo: Thx for the heads up, pkgbuild updated.

argo commented on 2014-03-13 23:01 (UTC)

Building is broken with current pkgbuild: '/home/user/yaourtbuild/aegisub-git/./PKGBUILD: line 29: cd: aegisub/aegisub: No such file or directory' And i suspect that it's this commit's fault https://github.com/Aegisub/Aegisub/commit/33a4a056a42a9e9f27618a4c3d9bebba593f540e

alucryd commented on 2013-12-13 08:40 (UTC)

aegisub now requires wxgtk>=3.0.0, unfortunately wxgtk in our repos still hasn't been updated, so no nightlies before this happens.

sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-12-06 02:39 (UTC)

I know, the last bugreport was all a big failure on my part, I admit. I have spoken with who has given me (cutting off balls, because my friend is a jabber chat). do not use the official PKGBUILDs not mean you can not help to resolve errors or reviews of the same about version naming. I'm not one to criticize, if they have done so for nothing. just try, if possible, to conform to what they have agreed. if he has taken it personally, sorry, not my intention greetings

alucryd commented on 2013-12-05 19:25 (UTC)

It seems my deleting your last comment wasn't clear enough, so I'm gonna write it down so you can understand. Your comments are less than useless, please stop. And that also goes for dumb bug reports like the last one on our bug tracker. Now if you think upstream is always right about versioning, I feel for you, all the more for something that goes like 'version that has nothing to do with current repo commit-branch that nobody cares about-at least some relevant sum'. If you're using your own PKGBUILD, why the fuck do you even care? Sure, you nagging me has nothing to do with me... And yeah, I sure hope you have nothing more to say, because I don't really take kindly to people wasting my time and any more comment will simply be obliterated.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 13 Next › Last »