Package amarok is in official repo
I don't think so? It got removed from the official repos.
This from AUR cannot be build
Agreed, but I don't think it should be renamed on that basis.
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/amarok.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | amarok |
Description: | The powerful music player for KDE |
Upstream URL: | https://apps.kde.org/amarok/ |
Licenses: | GPL2, FDL, LGPL2.1 |
Submitter: | arojas |
Maintainer: | FabioLolix |
Last Packager: | FabioLolix |
Votes: | 46 |
Popularity: | 0.146765 |
First Submitted: | 2018-08-28 13:52 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-30 12:35 (UTC) |
Package amarok is in official repo
I don't think so? It got removed from the official repos.
This from AUR cannot be build
Agreed, but I don't think it should be renamed on that basis.
This package should be rename to amarok-old, amarok2 or something like this. Package amarok is in official repo and in AUR. This from AUR cannot be build because of missing dependency in repos and in AUR.
Thanks for picking this up @frealgagu. You probably already know, but this package depends on qtscriptgenerator, which is missing in the repos/AUR, but also kdebase-runtime > kdelibs > polkit-qt4, which is also missing.
==EDIT== Eep, I just realised this also needs qca-qt4 as makedepends. This conflicts with qca, which is required by a whole bunch of kde things.
Pinned Comments
FabioLolix commented on 2024-08-03 19:20 (UTC)
I had a problem running the program, something about its database, solved deleting all local files (maybe it was too much yet it worked)