Package Details: android-sdk-build-tools r35.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/android-sdk-build-tools.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: android-sdk-build-tools
Description: Build-Tools for Google Android SDK (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx, llvm-rs-cc)
Upstream URL: https://developer.android.com/studio/releases/build-tools
Keywords: android
Licenses: custom
Submitter: xgdgsc
Maintainer: aminvakil
Last Packager: aminvakil
Votes: 484
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2013-05-16 03:44 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-24 15:38 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

aminvakil commented on 2025-03-26 13:43 (UTC)

This repository is maintained at https://github.com/aminvakil/aur.

In case anyone had any suggestions about anything, feel free to raise a PR there.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last »

mynacol commented on 2020-02-21 14:58 (UTC)

Hey @kyak, I haven't tried this. It seems Google doesn't provide downloadable executables for ARM, so this projcet cannot easily add support for ARM.

But a web search reveals that it is possible, e.g. by building it from source. [1] is years old, but may help you; Debian seems to build it too, maybe you can work with their packages [2].

In any case, if you have a working strategy to have the build-tools for ARM, you can post it here and we may be able to include it.

Good luck!

[1] https://www.timelesssky.com/blog/building-android-sdk-build-tools-aapt-for-debian-arm [2] https://packages.debian.org/buster/aapt

kyak commented on 2020-02-21 14:21 (UTC)

Hey guys! Have any of you had success using android-sdk-build-tools on ARM? It trying to make fdroid server work on ARM here...

mynacol commented on 2020-02-04 19:56 (UTC)

I just bumped the version to 29.0.3, thanks @kidonng for the notice.

At the same time, I switched to sha512 as checksum, as it is indeed faster than sha256 on modern computers. See https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/26336/sha512-faster-than-sha256 for more information.

somekool commented on 2019-10-21 02:34 (UTC)

lib32-* should be optional now, I bump the version to 0.29 as offered by @mynacol

should anyone else wants to maintain this package, please step up

mynacol commented on 2019-10-15 14:17 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-22 09:01 (UTC) by mynacol)

I updated the build tools to version 29.0.2 by applying the following diff:

From 311a5db6ffddfc6b6884ec5e6f7fa4c63498f524 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001

---
 PKGBUILD | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 2ec5ba6..99f8530 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # Maintainer: xgdgsc <xgdgsc @t gmail dot com>

 pkgname=android-sdk-build-tools
-_ver=28.0.3
+_ver=29.0.2
 pkgver=r$_ver
 pkgrel=1
 pkgdesc='Build-Tools for Google Android SDK (aapt, aidl, dexdump, dx, llvm-rs-cc)'
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ depends_x86_64=('lib32-gcc-libs' 'lib32-zlib')
 _sdk=android-sdk

 source=("https://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/build-tools_${pkgver}-linux.zip")
-sha1sums=('ea6f2f7103cd9da9ff0bdf6e37fbbba548fa4165')
-_android=android-9
+sha256sums=('1e9393cbfd4a4b82e30e7f55ab38db4a5a3259db93d5821c63597bc74522fa08')
+_android=android-10
 options=('!strip')

 package() {
-- 
2.23.0

rnmhdn commented on 2019-07-17 16:44 (UTC)

@somekool @xgdgsc Thank you so much for maintaining this package. I have a small question. Do you have any specific reason for not removing lib32-* from the dependencies? You have been asked to do that twice in 2017 but you didn't give any response and again twice in 2019(including myself:D)

kyak commented on 2019-05-19 09:45 (UTC)

Please remove the lib32-* dependencies or mark them as optional.

I have to enable the multilib repository just for lib32-zlib dependency of android-sdk-build-tools.

rpodgorny commented on 2018-09-18 23:12 (UTC)

just a cosmetic note -> the PKGBUILD has the executable flag...

xgdgsc commented on 2018-09-18 01:10 (UTC)

Adding to PATH used to cause problems https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-sdk-build-tools/?O=40&PP=10 . I don 't know if it still does now. You' d better create yourself for now.

fordprefect commented on 2018-09-17 11:43 (UTC)

could you add a link to the apksigner binary to /usr/bin so it appears in the PATH?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last »