Package Details: android-sdk-platform-tools 35.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/android-sdk-platform-tools.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: android-sdk-platform-tools
Description: Platform-Tools for Google Android SDK (adb and fastboot)
Upstream URL: http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
Keywords: android development
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: adb
Provides: adb, android-tools
Submitter: Gordin
Maintainer: dreamingincode
Last Packager: dreamingincode
Votes: 1276
Popularity: 1.02
First Submitted: 2011-01-29 23:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-17 06:45 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 19 Next › Last »

dreamingincode commented on 2022-02-17 20:58 (UTC)

@rany It works fine on my Arch Linux. Meanwhile you can always downgrade your package locally without a rollback on AUR.

rany commented on 2022-02-17 20:44 (UTC)

Can you rollback to 31.0.3? 32.0.0 broke adb (just SEGFAULts).

dreamingincode commented on 2020-08-19 19:21 (UTC)

@andrfgs There is no patch invocation in this PKGBUILD. You might be commmenting under the wrong package.

andrfgs commented on 2020-08-19 17:02 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-19 17:02 (UTC) by andrfgs)

This is broken for me when prepare step begins:

patching file adb/adb.cpp
Hunk #1 succeeded at 45 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 72 (offset 8 lines).
patching file adb/client/usb_libusb.cpp
patching file adb/sysdeps/posix/network.cpp
patching file adb/types.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 22 with fuzz 1.
can't find file to patch at input line 76
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff --git a/base/errors_unix.cpp b/base/errors_unix.cpp
|index 296995efe2..48269b6750 100644
|--- a/base/errors_unix.cpp
|+++ b/base/errors_unix.cpp
--------------------------
File to patch:

How do I know which file to manually patch?

dreamingincode commented on 2020-06-09 21:23 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-09 21:23 (UTC) by dreamingincode)

Chatted on email and determined that the package.xml isn't required for this package, so I'm not adding for now.

Kppqju77 commented on 2020-06-09 11:05 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-09 17:16 (UTC) by Kppqju77)

@dreamingincode could you also add package.xml so it is reported correctly in sdkmanager (for example mine reports 30.0.1 even if 30.0.2 is installed)?

dreamingincode commented on 2020-06-07 02:31 (UTC)

@dainis AUR comments are only for packaging issues. Please report issues about the software itself to the upstream.

dainis commented on 2020-06-07 00:30 (UTC)

After update my system i have same problem with adb as txtsd (command just sits there doing nothing, and I have to Ctrl+C to break out of it.) and it is not only for this package it's for android-tools too.

dreamingincode commented on 2020-04-21 02:04 (UTC) (edited on 2020-04-21 02:04 (UTC) by dreamingincode)

Re jwa11:

You'll find the answer if you look at the PKGBUILD for android-tools ( https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/android-tools ).

This package contains all the binaries from Google-released Android SDK Platform Tools, while that package manually compiles a subset of these binaries from AOSP. That package might be sufficient for non Android developers, but for developers this is more like the standard one to install. (Developers can also install Platform Tools within Android Studio, of course.)

jwa11 commented on 2020-04-20 14:09 (UTC)

What is the use of this package when community already contains a simpler-named and seemingly superior android-tools that adds its adb and fastboot executables to the $PATH? With this package I had to do pacman -Ql android-sdk-platform-tools and then run the files by typing their full paths at my prompt.

Just wondering if this is an oversight?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 19 Next › Last »