Package Details: android-studio 2024.2.1.12-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/android-studio.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: android-studio
Description: The official Android IDE (Stable branch)
Upstream URL: https://developer.android.com/
Keywords: android
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: TamCore
Maintainer: kordianbruck (SailReal)
Last Packager: SailReal
Votes: 1081
Popularity: 7.00
First Submitted: 2013-05-15 19:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-02 21:46 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

C0rn3j commented on 2024-10-26 17:04 (UTC)

2024.2 added a Wayland backend, not enabled by default. Works fine for me so far.

https://blog.jetbrains.com/platform/2024/07/wayland-support-preview-in-2024-2/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 .. 53 Next › Last »

Chais commented on 2013-09-09 22:06 (UTC)

Please also add android-support-repository and android-sdk-build-tools as depends. The latter doesn't seem optional to me, as 0.2.7 will fail to create new projects if build tools is missing.

the-k commented on 2013-09-08 17:51 (UTC)

New PKGBUILD: ------------------------------------------------------------------ # Maintainer: Philipp 'TamCore' B. <philipp [at] tamcore [dot] eu> # Contributor: Jakub Schmidtke <sjakub-at-gmail-dot-com> # Contributor: Christoph Brill <egore911-at-gmail-dot-com> # Contributor: Lubomir 'Kuci' Kucera <kuci24-at-gmail-dot-com> pkgname=android-studio pkgver=0.2.7 pkgrel=1 _build=130.737825 _patch=132.809981 pkgdesc="A new Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA." arch=(i686 x86_64) url="http://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio.html" license=('APACHE') depends=('python' 'fontconfig' 'mesa' 'libxrender' 'android-sdk') makedepends=('unzip' 'xorg-server-xvfb' 'ttf-dejavu') optdepends=('android-sdk-platform-tools' 'android-sdk-build-tools') options=('!strip') install=${pkgname}.install source=(http://dl.google.com/android/studio/android-studio-bundle-${_build}-linux.tgz ${pkgname}.desktop) test ! -z ${_patch} && source+=("http://dl.google.com/android/studio/patches/AI-${_build}-${_patch}-patch-unix.jar") noextract=(AI-${_build}-${_patch}-patch-unix.jar) sha256sums=('f7b2c9a9b04984c688d68de6b6da17cce3b46dfc71a14cd4a7a41128a26212e1' '2bba1530d217d055441b1075f53f09b172bdb56ae3908ef80201fd2ba766b33d' 'e708e3a9ce087e426ff1e9b7ccc60d7b4ba2d2025f493f2c8368dd6e932729bb') [ $CARCH = "x86_64" ] && depends=('python' 'lib32-fontconfig' 'lib32-mesa' 'lib32-libxrender' 'android-sdk') prepare() { echo "Performing update..." if [ ! -z "${_patch}" ] then xvfb-run java -classpath "${srcdir}/AI-${_build}-${_patch}-patch-unix.jar" com.intellij.updater.Runner install "${srcdir}/${pkgname}" || ret="${?}" if [ "${ret}" != "42" ]; then echo "Update process failed with code: ${ret}" exit 1 fi fi cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}" # remove pause after open jdk warning sed -i 's/read IGNORE//' bin/studio.sh # extract the application icon unzip -o lib/resources.jar artwork/icon_AS_128.png # enable anti aliasing for f in bin/*.vmoptions; do echo "-Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=lcd" >> ${f} echo "-Dswing.aatext=true" >> ${f} done } package() { cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}" # application stuff mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/opt/${pkgname}" cp -a bin lib plugins "${pkgdir}/opt/${pkgname}" mkdir -p "${pkgdir}/usr/bin" ln -s /opt/android-studio/bin/studio.sh "${pkgdir}/usr/bin/android-studio" # starter stuff install -Dm655 artwork/icon_AS_128.png "${pkgdir}/usr/share/pixmaps/${pkgname}.png" install -Dm655 "${srcdir}/${pkgname}.desktop" "${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/${pkgname}.desktop" chmod -R ugo+rX "${pkgdir}/opt" } ------------------------------------------------------------------ By the way, use SHA-256 for checksums. It is more collision resistant than MD5.

sthorn commented on 2013-09-05 18:52 (UTC)

0.2.7 released: http://tools.android.com/recent/androidstudio027released

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-08-31 13:30 (UTC)

why would you have to install both? If android-studio contains the SDK, there is no reason to install android-sdk. Even if you need other packages that depend on android-sdk, this - as far as I understand - shouldn't be a problem if the android-studio PKGBUILD has provides=android-sdk.

TamCore commented on 2013-08-31 13:23 (UTC)

@mus: I'm sure we will find a way to fix the problems, if upstream decides to patch the shipped Android SDK. But as long as both SDKs are the same, I don't see a reason why we should have both installed on our machines :)

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-08-31 10:12 (UTC)

@erick2red That is because TamCore decided to split out the SDK out of the bundle and instead let the package depend on the android-sdk package (also in the AUR). I personally don't think this is a good idea. Upstream ships the SDK together with Android Studio, so the package should too. Also this may cause imcompatibilities in the future if the versions differ somehow (what if an android studio patch patches part of the SDK etc.?).

erick2red commented on 2013-08-29 14:30 (UTC)

It fails to find Android SDK. What's strange is that the bundle unpacked just downloaded from google does find the SDK.

sjakub commented on 2013-08-28 18:38 (UTC)

It still installs files with wrong permissions.

ma2t commented on 2013-08-27 13:02 (UTC)

Android studio 0.2.6 released. :) http://tools.android.com/recent/androidstudio026released

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 .. 53 Next › Last »