Search Criteria
Package Details: evdi-dkms-git 1.14.15.r0.g3dafd62-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/evdi-dkms-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | evdi-dkms-git |
| Description: | Kernel module to enable management of multiple screens |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/DisplayLink/evdi |
| Licenses: | MIT, GPL-2.0-only, LGPL-2.1-only |
| Conflicts: | evdi, evdi-dkms, python-pyevdi |
| Provides: | evdi, evdi-dkms |
| Submitter: | xiota |
| Maintainer: | xiota (severach) |
| Last Packager: | xiota |
| Votes: | 30 |
| Popularity: | 0.89 |
| First Submitted: | 2025-03-20 21:09 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-02-25 17:41 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- dkms (dkms-gitAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- libdrm (libdrm-gitAUR) (make)
- pybind11 (pybind11-gitAUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- python (optional) – for pyevdi
Required by (3)
- displaylink (requires evdi)
- lianli-linux-git (requires evdi-dkms)
- smi-usbdisplay
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next › Last »
LinaM commented on 2021-07-18 22:05 (UTC)
Package installation without problems - with kernel 5.13.1-3 (manjaro, install displaylink afterwards)
olof commented on 2021-06-05 10:10 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-05 10:11 (UTC) by olof)
This package seems to use the wrong Linux headers.
From the last line of the install log:
Notice x.y.9 vs x.y.8 in the kernel version. Am I doing something wrong? Any ideas for a workaround? Installing with
paru evdi-git.Gildoniel commented on 2021-04-27 09:10 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-27 09:17 (UTC) by Gildoniel)
As max-k wrote before: Installing displaylink: ...
...
evdi-git provides evdi-git-1.9.1.r3.gb0b3d13-1 which breaks displaylink package.
max-k commented on 2021-04-26 15:58 (UTC)
r4 version seems to be gone. Latest available version seems to be 1.9.1.r3.xxxx which breaks displaylink package.
liamtimms commented on 2021-04-18 18:13 (UTC)
Hi @mtorromeo could you throw a version up on github which better fits your recommendations? This way @severach may be able to just copy and paste the appropriate changes and users (like me) could start using your version directly if @sererach doesn't update this version immediately.
mtorromeo commented on 2021-04-12 07:48 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-12 07:48 (UTC) by mtorromeo)
This PKGBUILD needs a lot cleanup:
Remove the useless set -u/set+u, they are causing issues.
Do not build the whole module in the build() step. It builds against the running kernel instead of against the installed ones, again causing issues and wasting time for nothing.
Remove the .install script, it's not a wiki for the package.
The previous version wrote by @ajs124 was mostly fine.
thx1138 commented on 2021-04-11 18:54 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-11 20:00 (UTC) by thx1138)
Hmm - linux 5.11.13.arch1-1
This from the new pacman 5.2.2-3, in testing, with /etc/makepkg.conf, CFLAGS, now including "-Werror=format-security".
And then, anyway:
And then:
So, instead:
bnavigator commented on 2021-04-11 18:03 (UTC)
Just disable the build of the kernel module completely and let dkms do its magic. You only need to build the library, like in the non-git evdi PKGBUILD.
thx1138 commented on 2021-04-11 17:37 (UTC)
This issue with the evdi-git PKGBUILD looking in the nonexistent /lib/modules/ directory is pretty silly. Yes, pacman's makepkg did the wrong thing too, providing a useless error message, and yes, the user did the wrong thing too, not rebooting after the kernel upgrade. But the finger-pointing is juvenile. Don't simply blame the user, and don't simply blame pacman and makepkg, when it should be easy enough to fix the PKGBUILD, to first check whether the /lib/modules/ directory exists.
Is it actually necessary to only build the evdi library while the most recent kernel is running?
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next › Last »