Package Details: filebot 5.1.3-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/filebot.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: filebot
Description: The ultimate TV and Movie Renamer
Upstream URL: https://www.filebot.net/
Keywords: mass media rename subtitle
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: filebot-git, filebot47
Provides: filebot
Submitter: ndowens
Maintainer: rvasilev
Last Packager: rvasilev
Votes: 138
Popularity: 0.37
First Submitted: 2009-06-21 07:41 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-30 19:38 (UTC)

Dependencies (6)

Required by (0)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

mithrial commented on 2022-03-03 21:16 (UTC)

This package now verifies the downloaded package against rednoahs PGP key:

gpg --recv-keys B0976E51E5C047AD0FD051294E402EBF7C3C6A71

(The key from https://get.filebot.net/filebot/KEYS )

rvasilev commented on 2018-11-11 11:46 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-03 22:07 (UTC) by rvasilev)

Looking for a co-maintainer.

Please report bugs & fixes https://github.com/arch-noob/filebot

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 25 Next › Last »

apodim commented on 2016-12-24 19:42 (UTC)

Just a note to those that don't want to use java-p7zip-binding, or can't because their platform is not supported (arm). You can also use "Apache Common VFS", which is actually the default extractor of filebot portable, or "p7zip".

max.bra commented on 2016-09-29 06:27 (UTC)

@talonz there is a dedicaded post install advice for that.

talonz commented on 2016-09-29 06:22 (UTC)

Needed to install java-openjfx to be able to rename files.

max.bra commented on 2016-08-09 17:04 (UTC)

sorry i can't monitor source change without version bump i'm not able right now to update the package: can you download a snapshot of the package and do a "updpkgsum && makepkg"?

krypt commented on 2016-08-08 13:49 (UTC)

md5 doesn't match for FileBot_4.7.1-portable.zip

max.bra commented on 2016-08-02 21:34 (UTC) (edited on 2016-08-02 22:09 (UTC) by max.bra)

@j1simon > Can you put a mandatory dependency depending on the installed java vm? Unfortunately it's not possible > Otherwise, it might be good idea to put as optional dependency with a brief explanation. This is not the case of an optional dependency (it's exactly mandatory) but a package message/advice post installation is an easy solution completely adoptable applying... done! and thanks for reporting

j1simon commented on 2016-08-02 13:57 (UTC)

ok, I understand, it's only a mandatory dependency when openjdk is the java vm installed. Can you put a mandatory dependency depending on the installed java vm? Otherwise, it might be good idea to put as optional dependency with a brief explanation. What do you think?

max.bra commented on 2016-08-02 13:54 (UTC)

@j1simon If you install Oracle jre you dont need openjfx. Can we leave the freedom to install the Java vm that user want or not?

j1simon commented on 2016-08-02 13:45 (UTC)

@max.bra I don't agree with you. java-openjfx is necessary to execute filebot so it's a mandatory dependency. @rednoah is the creator of this program, he knows better than anyone the dependencies of his program.

max.bra commented on 2016-08-02 13:28 (UTC)

@j1simon If you read my comments and not only those of rednoah you can see my suggestion over openjfx and why it is not e will not be a dependency.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 .. 25 Next › Last »