Package Details: google-chrome 129.0.6668.58-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/google-chrome.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: google-chrome
Description: The popular web browser by Google (Stable Channel)
Upstream URL: https://www.google.com/chrome
Keywords: chromium
Licenses: custom:chrome
Submitter: None
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 2236
Popularity: 7.19
First Submitted: 2010-05-25 20:25 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-17 21:41 (UTC)

Dependencies (12)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

gromit commented on 2023-04-15 08:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-05-08 21:42 (UTC) by gromit)

When reporting this package as outdated make sure there is indeed a new version for Linux Desktop. You can have a look at the "Stable updates" tag in Release blog for this.

You can also run this command to obtain the version string for the latest chrome version:

$ curl -sSf https://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb/dists/stable/main/binary-amd64/Packages | \
     grep -A1 "Package: google-chrome-stable" | \
     awk '/Version/{print $2}' | \
     cut -d '-' -f1

Do not report updates for ChromeOS, Android or other platforms stable versions as updates here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 .. 157 Next › Last »

mike.cloaked commented on 2012-08-13 21:02 (UTC)

Seems that version 21.0.1180.77 was pushed out rather soon after the previous version!

Det commented on 2012-08-12 10:37 (UTC)

Naturally. Deb: http://pastebin.com/cP2rZPwm Rpm: http://pastebin.com/6329UEjW

antihero commented on 2012-08-12 09:57 (UTC)

Det do you have an up-to-date PKGBUILD I could use?

Det commented on 2012-08-12 09:55 (UTC)

Because the guy I had this discussion with felt .rpm's were more fit for Arch due to its lack of debianisms (the .menu and changelog.gz) even after it was revealed they use an inferior compression algorithm (Bzip2 vs LZMA). E: We originally used debs. I still do with my local package.

tancrackers commented on 2012-08-12 02:02 (UTC)

Why not use the .deb packages instead? Isn't chrome optimized mostly for Ubuntu anyways?

Det commented on 2012-08-11 16:17 (UTC)

Yeah, as already stated.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 .. 157 Next › Last »