Here's another PKGBUILD: supports thunarx-2 (GTK2 thunar from [extra]) or thunarx-3 (GTK3 thunar: thunar-devel or thunar-git) determinted at build time based on which version you have installed. Also supports specifying filemanager plugins to build. https://pastebin.com/nNrYuHdb
Search Criteria
Package Details: gtkhash 1.5-3
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/gtkhash.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | gtkhash |
Description: | A GTK+ utility for computing message digests or checksums |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/tristanheaven/gtkhash |
Keywords: | crc32 digest hash md5 sha1 sha256 sha512 |
Licenses: | GPL |
Conflicts: | gtkhash-caja, gtkhash-nautilus, gtkhash-nemo, gtkhash-thunar |
Provides: | gtkhash |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | Santi-Burgos |
Last Packager: | Santi-Burgos |
Votes: | 70 |
Popularity: | 0.51 |
First Submitted: | 2008-05-11 12:46 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-06-06 00:32 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- dconf
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libb2 (libb2-gitAUR)
- libgcrypt
- nettle (nettle-gitAUR)
- appstream-glib (appstream-glib-gitAUR) (make)
- intltool (make)
- librsvg (librsvg-gitAUR) (make)
- meson (meson-gitAUR) (make)
- xdg-utils (busking-gitAUR, xdg-utils-slockAUR, mimiAUR, mimi-gitAUR, xdg-utils-handlrAUR, openerAUR, xdg-utils-mimeoAUR, mimejs-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
twa022 commented on 2017-12-25 17:42 (UTC)
twa022 commented on 2017-12-15 02:06 (UTC)
The plugin works fine with the GTK3 version of thunar, here is a PKGBUILD that supports adjusting the build at compile time depending on installed thunar version: https://pastebin.com/xDxY7UAb
spinvis commented on 2017-10-21 12:36 (UTC)
Works great, thanks so much. To all the people complaining, read the PKGBUILD before compiling. It ain't hard, stop being lazy.
Plexcon commented on 2017-08-02 08:41 (UTC) (edited on 2017-08-02 08:46 (UTC) by Plexcon)
configure: error: Package requirements (thunarx-2) were not met:
No package 'thunarx-2' found
==> ERROR: Se produjo un fallo en build().
Cancelando...
annoyingduck commented on 2017-06-14 18:43 (UTC)
@MorningStarGG The maintainer explains in the comments as to why all file managers & dependencies are installed (it's easier for him to maintain). If you use Pamac and have "remove unrequired dependencies" option selected, just install the gtkhash package, go back into Pamac and click just the file managers you do not need (ex: nautilus, nemo, caja) and let Pamac remove all of those & all of the packages that the GTKhash script pulled in. It's a very simple and quick way to install/update this package. Or you can do it via Pacman (ex: sudo pacman -Rs nautilus nemo caja) which will remove those file managers and all the dependencies including the un-needed gtkhash file manager plugins.
MorningStarGG commented on 2017-06-14 13:04 (UTC)
Ok requiring "caja, libnautilus-extension, nemo" are just totally overboard for this on an XFCE based system, which is generally who would be running Thunar. By requiring those dependencies you bring in some other desktop packages from those related filemanagers and such. It's messy, and just does not need to happen.
I went through via yaourt and edited the PKGBUILD before it ran and removed those mentioned above, and installed it just fine without those, and it's working just fine without those. Please fix this.
annoyingduck commented on 2017-05-04 16:06 (UTC)
I forgot to reply back here. Current updated build 1.1-1 has been working perfect with current Thunar on XFCE. All issues resolved, just wanted to note that here.
ncoder-2 commented on 2017-04-22 16:11 (UTC)
Is there a reason to have cinnamon-desktop, nemo, thunar, and a whole lot of other packages as dependencies if someone only has GNOME and wants gtkhash for Nautilus only?
T0t0 commented on 2017-04-20 01:01 (UTC)
There is a problem of dependence.
If I chose gtkhash-nemo, I need to install caja, mate-desktop, and thunar ????
I said that I cinnamon.
annoyingduck commented on 2017-02-18 19:39 (UTC)
@carstene1ns the XFCE devs are looking into the issue via bugzilla. Sorry, but I'm not sure how to go about building this using git history. Can it be done via yoaurt or do I download the old version source and build via mkpkg?
Pinned Comments