Package Details: intellij-idea-ultimate-edition 2016.2.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/intellij-idea-ultimate-edition.git (read-only)
Package Base: intellij-idea-ultimate-edition
Description: An intelligent IDE for Java, Groovy and other programming languages with advanced refactoring features intensely focused on developer productivity.
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/
Licenses: Commercial
Submitter: uwolfer
Maintainer: uwolfer (dcelasun)
Last Packager: uwolfer
Votes: 207
Popularity: 7.521955
First Submitted: 2009-10-28 09:09
Last Updated: 2016-08-17 07:04

Latest Comments

uwolfer commented on 2016-07-13 05:49

@jshap70: Do you think downloading the checksum from the same source as you retrieve the download is really safe? If you have write access, you can manipulate both source and checksum.

I will look into the JRE bundling later. I don't really like the idea of having a bundled JRE, but it seems that JetBrains is "forced" to do that...

jshap70 commented on 2016-07-12 22:51

bumping @Teedee 's comment about including the JRE. Also, take a look at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intellij-idea-ue-eap/ 's pkgbuild to automatically get sha256 sums from jetbrains. You just add .sha256 onto the end of the .tar.gz url.

Teedee commented on 2016-07-11 21:03

The new font ligatures feature in the upcoming release relies on the bundled Jetbrains JRE. It seems more of a hassle to change the pkgbuild to download the release with the bundled Jetbrains JRE (also have to deal with checksums etc) than to just have a commented line in the pkgbuild which removes the bundled JRE after download. I suggest switching back to the download with the Jetbrains JRE bundled.

Tobi042 commented on 2016-06-14 11:01

Removing the epoch again now confused pacman again:

warning: downgrading package intellij-idea-ultimate-edition (2:2016.1.2b-1 => 2016.1.3-1)

I think now that it was there once, we need to keep it.

voop commented on 2016-06-06 16:04

@rdoursenaud I don't think epoch version bumping is necessary. It also doesn't make sense bump epoch number when minor change is released.

I would rather use version 2016.1.2.b-1, which will not produce "downgrade warning issue" mentioned in previous comments.

I would also consider compatibility fix from openssl package to avoid having two version numbers in PKGBUILD:
{code}
_ver=1.0.2h
# use a pacman compatible version scheme
pkgver=${_ver/[a-z]/.${_ver//[0-9.]/}}
{code}

rdoursenaud commented on 2016-06-02 02:31

That's exactly why there is epoch in PKGBUILD.
See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#epoch

Also according to the wiki, you can use vercmp to make sure the version is seen as newer.

Chewtoy commented on 2016-06-01 05:23

@uwolfer & @blmarket: Yes. Exactly. Pacman thinks the "b" means that the package is a beta-version. And since the last package wasn't a "b" version, this 'must' be a downgrade.
However, if you go to jetbrains download page ( https://www.jetbrains.com/idea/download/download-thanks.html?platform=linux ), they serve the "b"-version as the latest one.
So I suppose this thing is more of a "Who the heck uses letters in stable releases?" and "Who the heck adds letters to the next iteration of a stable release without bumping the numbers?" (to which the answer seems to include JetBrains)

blmarket commented on 2016-06-01 01:49

pacman thinks 2016.1.2-1 is the newer than 2016.1.2b-1, maybe it regards 'b' as beta?

warning: downgrading package intellij-idea-ultimate-edition (2016.1.2-1 => 2016.1.2b-1)

uwolfer commented on 2016-05-31 06:08

@Chewtoy: 2016.1.2b-1 is the newer version, isn't it?

Chewtoy commented on 2016-05-31 05:35

What's up with the revert? I now have a newer IntelliJ installed than AUR.
2016.1.2-1 (local) vs 2016.1.2b-1 (AUR).

All comments