The following patch was used to build in a clean chroot per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
Search Criteria
Package Details: joplin-desktop 3.0.14-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | joplin |
Description: | A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities - Desktop |
Upstream URL: | https://joplinapp.org/ |
Keywords: | markdown note notetaking productivity |
Licenses: | MIT |
Groups: | joplin |
Conflicts: | joplin-desktop-electron |
Submitter: | masterkorp |
Maintainer: | masterkorp |
Last Packager: | masterkorp |
Votes: | 263 |
Popularity: | 1.77 |
First Submitted: | 2018-04-18 16:33 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-07-29 19:54 (UTC) |
Dependencies (22)
- electron (electron-binAUR)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- libexif (libexif-gitAUR)
- libgsf (libgsf-gitAUR)
- libjpeg-turbo (mozjpeg-gitAUR, libjpeg-turbo-gitAUR, mozjpegAUR)
- libwebp (libwebp-gitAUR)
- libxss
- nodejs (nodejs-lts-fermiumAUR, nodejs-gitAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR, nodejs-lts-hydrogen, nodejs-lts-iron)
- nss (nss-hgAUR)
- orc
- electron (electron-binAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- jq (jq-gitAUR) (make)
- libgsf (libgsf-gitAUR) (make)
- node-gyp (corepackerAUR) (make)
- npm (corepackerAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR) (make)
- yarn (yarn-pnpm-corepackAUR, corepackerAUR, yarn-berryAUR) (make)
- Show 2 more dependencies...
Required by (0)
Sources (4)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 Next › Last »
jeagoss commented on 2019-03-31 01:15 (UTC)
CodeFox commented on 2019-03-06 14:21 (UTC)
@masterkorp is it possible to get this package updated to the right hash? the 135 version also has a bad hash sum check.
gonesimera commented on 2019-03-04 09:05 (UTC)
@sseneca Thank you, it is updating now.
sseneca commented on 2019-03-02 13:24 (UTC)
@nunoun and @gonesimera
You have to replace the sha256sum that @petsam posted with the first sha256sum found in the array "sha256sums".
So it should look like this:
sha256sums=('01bf4f7e311d79b7e309e158c46b6dd321194eb17e90f09db3ff41b75f35fffa'
...)
gonesimera commented on 2019-03-02 07:43 (UTC)
I have exactly the same problem as @nunoun
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... joplin.desktop ... FAILED joplin-desktop.sh ... Passed joplin.sh ... Passed v1.0.135.zip ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
If I use the sha256sum suggested by @petsam I get the following error: ==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.
Kunda commented on 2019-03-01 21:45 (UTC)
@petsam thank you that worked.
nunonun commented on 2019-03-01 09:24 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-01 09:30 (UTC) by nunonun)
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... joplin.desktop ... FAILED joplin-desktop.sh ... Passed joplin.sh ... Passed v1.0.135.zip ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
If I use the sha256sum suggested by @petsam I get the following error: ==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.
petsam commented on 2019-02-28 20:54 (UTC)
New sha256sum for joplin.desktop 01bf4f7e311d79b7e309e158c46b6dd321194eb17e90f09db3ff41b75f35fffa
konig commented on 2019-02-28 14:05 (UTC) (edited on 2019-02-28 14:35 (UTC) by konig)
the sums of desktop.sh is invalid
Validating source files with sha256sums... joplin.desktop ... FAILED
You can skip te validation string, however this should be fixed regardless
Pinned Comments
masterkorp commented on 2021-12-27 11:30 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-27 11:32 (UTC) by masterkorp)
Hello everyone,
There was been several difficulties upgrading the Joplin due to major changes in the build system upstream.
I have finnally got version 2.6.10 working with pacthes, but remenber:
You may need to remove your src/ folder before using this version
The patches are still not perfect, you must say yes to a prompt
I will continue working on this later today, but its usable and stable, please remenber you can always report issues on the github repository.
Regards, Alfredo Palhares
masterkorp commented on 2020-12-24 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-24 20:00 (UTC) by masterkorp)
Hello everyone,
I will be renaming the packages to its final form.
Also, please for problems with the package, please open an issue on the Github repo, its really hard to provide support on the comments section, you can also email me.
If you have problems with the
check()
function, just run makepkg with the--nocheck
flag.Thank you for your patience. Regards, Alfredo Palhares