Search Criteria
Package Details: keypunch-git 1:6.2.r8.g77f9956-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/keypunch-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | keypunch-git |
Description: | Practice your typing skills |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/bragefuglseth/keypunch |
Keywords: | gtk4 libadwaita rust typing |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | keypunch |
Provides: | keypunch |
Submitter: | Giteeajake |
Maintainer: | Giteeajake (Integral, lilac) |
Last Packager: | lilac |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 1.23 |
First Submitted: | 2025-03-20 01:57 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-05-19 15:22 (UTC) |
Dependencies (7)
- gtk4 (gtk4-paper-planeAUR, gtk4-gitAUR)
- libadwaita (libadwaita-gitAUR, libadwaita-without-adwaita-gitAUR)
- blueprint-compiler (blueprint-compiler-gitAUR) (make)
- cargo (rustup-gitAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rust-beta-binAUR, rustup-stubAUR, rust, rustup) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- meson (meson-gitAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, ninja-gitAUR, ninja-jobserverAUR, ninja-memAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-27 00:33 (UTC)
@siliconmeadow
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-26 10:56 (UTC)
I'm sorry I only saw it today
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-26 10:55 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but because the upstream master doesn't have version synchronization, and in order to ensure that the latest code is used, the upstream master is selected, and my package has been merged into archlinuxcn/repo, so lilac will be updated automatically
siliconmeadow commented on 2025-05-25 13:46 (UTC)
Why are we not using the latest tagged version - 6.3? And why are we not doing checksums to validate what is being downloaded? This seems a prime candidate for a keylogging hack!
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-20 22:26 (UTC)
sorry I feel a little tired
BlackCherry commented on 2025-05-19 14:24 (UTC)
the pkgver in the build of the PKGBUILD isn't necessary because the name's folder is only keypunch
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-18 05:08 (UTC)
this is very bad :(
Giteeajake commented on 2025-05-18 04:51 (UTC)
thanks siliconmeadow
siliconmeadow commented on 2025-05-17 16:45 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-17 17:03 (UTC) by siliconmeadow)
The latest version doesn't install the latest version and simply keeps reinstalling the tip of the branch where the 6.2 starts (currently 6.2.r8.g77f9956-1). Here is a patch to download a tarball of the v6.3 source and also validates the checksum:
Smoerrebroed commented on 2025-03-29 14:04 (UTC)
Yes, that's better! :-) Many thanks again.
1 2 3 Next › Last »