Search Criteria
Package Details: libtd 1.8.16-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/libtd.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | libtd |
Description: | Cross-platform library for building Telegram clients |
Upstream URL: | https://core.telegram.org/tdlib |
Licenses: | boost |
Conflicts: | telegram-tdlib |
Provides: | libtd |
Submitter: | felixseblanc |
Maintainer: | j.r |
Last Packager: | j.r |
Votes: | 5 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2019-09-29 16:03 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-08-27 20:15 (UTC) |
Dependencies (8)
- gcc-libs (gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR)
- openssl (openssl-gitAUR, openssl-hardenedAUR, openssl-staticAUR, quictls-opensslAUR)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compatAUR)
- clang (clang8AUR, clang-gitAUR, llvm-gitAUR, clang-minimal-gitAUR) (make)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-vfsAUR, git-run-command-patch-gitAUR, git-gitAUR, git-fcAUR) (make)
- gperf (gperf-gitAUR) (make)
- php (php-legacy-symlinksAUR, php7-symlinksAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
xiota commented on 2023-11-12 13:14 (UTC)
Provides on
libtd
should be removed because all packages provides themselves.Provides on
telegram-tdlib
should be added because it share the same files and upstream project.j.r commented on 2022-12-02 12:14 (UTC)
@kovdan01 thanks for the patch. Could you please
git send-email
the patch to j.r@jugendhacker.de? Because I somehow can'tgit am
it from my clipboard.kovdan01 commented on 2022-11-25 13:41 (UTC)
Hello @j.r ! Please consider using cmake wrappers instead of make commands in PKGBUILD. When a custom
CMAKE_GENERATOR
environment variable is set, we have to use something likecmake --build . --target all
instead of justmake
. The same applies tomake install
. I've prepared a patch for that. Would be glad if you apply it usinggit am
to save my credits in commit history. Thanks!dreieck commented on 2022-03-08 16:03 (UTC)
Should
telegram-tdlib
(=${pkgver}
) be added to theprovides
array? For the packagelibtd-dev
that is the case.j.r commented on 2021-05-04 06:21 (UTC)
@djmattyg007 I updated the package according to cmake package guidelines, but unfortunately upstream somehow added compile tasks to the install target. I think there is not much I can do to avoid compilation in the package step. If you have a solution feel free to send me a patch over at sr.ht
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-05-01 12:48 (UTC)
I just built the latest version of this package, and I found that compilation was happening inside the package() function. This doesn't seem correct - compilation should be complete once build() is finished.
qontinuum commented on 2021-04-29 12:43 (UTC)
Okay thank you for the precision ^^
j.r commented on 2021-04-29 11:59 (UTC)
@franck.stauffer I'll remove make, but I explicitly set clang, because according to the libtd build instructions it does consume less RAM during build. For many multiple users the build failed before because they ran out of RAM.
qontinuum commented on 2021-04-29 11:14 (UTC)
make
is in the base-devel group so it shouldn't be a makedep since this group is a pre-requisite.Also, are you sure it's a good thing to enforce the compiler? Since
CC
andCXX
can be set inmakepkg.conf
and the program compiles well using gcc I think it shouldn't be enforced by a PKGBUILD that do not strictly requires it.Arndroid commented on 2021-02-04 20:57 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-04 21:04 (UTC) by Arndroid)
Thanks!
Edit, ah too bad it didn't make it all the way:
1 2 Next › Last »