Package Details: lightdm-git 1.30.0.r9.g03f21898-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/lightdm-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lightdm-git
Description: A lightweight display manager
Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/lightdm
Licenses: GPL3, LGPL3
Conflicts: lightdm
Provides: lightdm
Submitter: SolarAquarion
Maintainer: SolarAquarion
Last Packager: SolarAquarion
Votes: 280
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2017-12-18 19:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2019-12-15 20:56 (UTC)

Required by (46)

Sources (9)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. 40 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-05 04:04 (UTC)

@padfoot You are right,and your solution is working well for xfce. Gnome users would use gdm instead,so they don't have the problem. :)

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-05 03:25 (UTC)

@dgbaley27 Yes, the intended behaviour is to use users.conf when accountsservice is not present, yet my install does not do that. Users.conf is completely ignored. I had to change the uid of users to be hidden to <500 for them to no longer display.

dgbaley27 commented on 2012-05-04 22:02 (UTC)

lightdm uses accountsservice if available. It falls back to users.conf if it has to. It never uses both. I have added a wishlist item to lightdm to allow users.conf to be used no matter what. As far as accountsservice goes, I think they changed it from a min uid to just a blacklist. It's really dumb. People keep writing these stupid DBus daemons and don't provide any flat config files.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-04 21:51 (UTC)

@pomhg, you are right, but it is a combination of the 2. I changed my uid for lightdm and mpd to <500 and they still displayed in the lightdm list. I use Xfce, so my only requirement for accountsservice is lightdm. I rebuilt without the accountsservice dependency, removed accountsservice and then the uid's < 500 no longer showed. Now, without accountsservice, I changed to uid's to >500 but <1000, and they displayed again. So there is a problem with accountsservice, but there is also a problem with lightdm as it seems to ignore the users.conf file (defaults to hide uid's <1000), where lightdm actually hides uid's <500. So I have my solution, no accountsservice and uid's <500 for those to be hidden. Although this will not work for Gnome users, as accountsservice is required.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-04 15:01 (UTC)

@padfoot I think the problem is AccountsService. On my machine as long as AccountsService is installed,even mpd whose uid is 45 by default is also displayed in the userlist of LightDM.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-04 06:03 (UTC)

It seems it's required to have dbus up and running for lightdm to work - at least, I got a blank screen everytime I tried to start up lightdm until I started up dbus. Can this be added to the wiki page?

dgbaley27 commented on 2012-05-02 14:13 (UTC)

As far as accountsservice goes, the real problem is the damn thing has no configuration options. Just because it's a dbus daemon doesn't mean it can't have a flat config file in /etc. In any event, I put in a request: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/976554 so +1 it or whatever they do on launchpad.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-02 09:44 (UTC)

@morfeo May I suggest you change the uid of the lightdm user to <500 so the lightdm user is not displayed in the user list at login. Also, accountsservice is not a required dependency. It would be better suited as an optdepend. Cheers.

jrk commented on 2012-04-22 18:43 (UTC)

Ok, for heaven's sake.. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58707

dgbaley27 commented on 2012-04-18 16:09 (UTC)

That's your opinion. I don't see why upstream would be opposed to supporting alternate xsessions locations. For now it's just not high priority and would require some rework to get a separate list for each user (or generate a new list each time a new user is selected). This could get complicated when typing an unlisted user.