| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | linux-lqx |
| Description: | The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules |
| Upstream URL: | https://liquorix.net/ |
| Keywords: | bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
| Provides: | KSMBD-MODULE, NTSYNC-MODULE, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE |
| Submitter: | akurei |
| Maintainer: | sir_lucjan (damentz) |
| Last Packager: | damentz |
| Votes: | 168 |
| Popularity: | 0.89 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-09-09 21:58 (UTC) |
It still wasn't working with the previous 2 updates. Was still messing up EFI and DRM.
This time with 6.9.3, it fails with all dkms modules. Won't even build them.
I have 6.9.3.arch1-1 custom compiled and working. But the same doesn't happen with this lqx kernel.
The question is: What's the difference between this AUR package/PKGBUILD and the one from liquorix.net? That one at least works. What config/scripts/sources are used there, such that it works there but not here?
@damentz There is nothing wrong with my initramfs, It works with every other custom kernel I have compiled and currently running. I also have liquorix installed from liquorix.net, that one works fine as well.
This one compiles fine, but works only partially.
There is something wrong with the scripts/patches that makes it fail with nvidia,nfs,network manager etc etc.
archdevlab, There's not really "optimized" for Arch Linux, but the config is optimized best for responsiveness and interactivity. The alternative scheduler has most of the impact while some deviations in config from Zen Kernel make the rest of the difference.
Arch_User, That sounds like your initramfs image is busted, if nothing's working and random things are failing to load, it's because the init system couldn't get access to modules on your filesystem to support your hardware, IMO. You can probably get help on bbs.archlinux.org; troubleshooting issues like that isn't in scope of comments on an AUR package.
Can someone confirm that this works on Arch with Nvidia? I have tried several times but it just doesn't work. It fails to mount stuff, fails with efi, fails with nfs, fails with Network Manager and fails to start gui with nvidia modules.
Yes I have built the dkms modules with the liquorix kernel. Lsmod shows them loaded, but nothing happens. It stops after graphical.target. You can ctrl+alt+f2/3/4/5/6 but not 7
Hi while Lqx and Zen kernel patches are almost the same what about the config you use. His the config from liquorix package optimized for Archlinux? What would be the main difference? Thanks!
@xiota that's a red herring, htmldocs just creates html documentation using sphinx. The non html files are still there and are perfectly usable and preferred by many.
linux-lqx-docs needs to be removed from pkgname array when _htmldocs_enable is empty.
@damentz yes, I confirm, everything has become fine.
In addition to this, I did not write about it, but the warning disappeared when generating the UKI.
This warning didn't affect anything, and there was nothing in the logs, so I didn't think it was necessary to write about it earlier.
Thank you very much @damentz!
Everything seems to be ok with latest version
┌─[21:36:28]─[root@Gaia-E]
└──> amarcord # dmesg | grep jitter
┌─[✗]─[21:36:32]─[root@Gaia-E]
└──> amarcord # dmesg | grep bpf
[ 0.375484] LSM: initializing lsm=capability,yama,bpf
[ 3.144390] systemd[1]: bpf-lsm: LSM BPF program attached
amarcord # Thank you very much. Regards.
Pinned Comments
damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)
Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix
Signing key import instructions:
sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D