Package Details: linux-lqx 6.8.7.lqx2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: UKSMD-BUILTIN, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 158
Popularity: 1.26
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-19 15:10 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (11)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 .. 120 Next › Last »

damentz commented on 2023-10-01 05:26 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-01 05:26 (UTC) by damentz)

linux-zen is a conservative enthusiast kernel that works well in most situations, linux-ck is CK patches on mainline (obsolete since Con doesn't maintain it anymore), linux-lqx is a variation of zen with a focus on low latency at cost of throughput.

tee commented on 2023-09-30 23:34 (UTC)

What's the difference between this and linux-zen or linux-ck?

damentz commented on 2023-07-23 19:41 (UTC)

@dr460nf1r3, I'm surprised you didn't explain why python needs to be added to makedeps, so I did my own research and put the results in the commit:

commit abd41bbc92fef8c57a945c2bdfb7061ebb89e16f
Author: Steven Barrett <steven@liquorix.net>
Date:   Sun Jul 23 14:34:12 2023 -0500

    Add python to dependencies, fixes bpf build

    Build error:

    /usr/bin/env: ‘python3’: No such file or directory
    make[3]: *** [Makefile:160: /build/src/linux-6.4/tools/bpf/resolve_btfids/libbpf/bpf_helper_defs.h] Error 127

    At the line in the Makefile:

    $(BPF_HELPER_DEFS): $(srctree)/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
            $(QUIET_GEN)$(srctree)/scripts/bpf_doc.py --header \
                    --file $(srctree)/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h > $(BPF_HELPER_DEFS)

    In this case, python is required to execute bpf_doc.py.  Add python to
    dependencies.

Pushed out new package version with added dependency.

dr460nf1r3 commented on 2023-07-23 18:16 (UTC)

Could you please add python to makedeps?

tydynrain commented on 2023-04-08 22:25 (UTC)

@crud, thank you so much for mentioning that! I was looking at line 270. I should have thought to just comment it out. Doh! @damentz, thank you so much for adding that to the line! That fixed it and everything builds fine again! Brilliant!

crud commented on 2023-04-08 14:43 (UTC)

@damentz Thank you very much, now everything is going without errors

damentz commented on 2023-04-08 14:29 (UTC)

Added a || true to the install step for resolve_btfids and bumped the package version. You'll still see the error but it won't stop the build.

damentz commented on 2023-04-08 14:21 (UTC)

You mean enabled? Disabling that option will cause resolve_btfids to not get created.

crud commented on 2023-04-08 14:12 (UTC)

damentz@ Yes, when DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES is disabled, there are no build errors

damentz commented on 2023-04-08 14:08 (UTC)

Ah I see, are you two disabling the DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES config? This will result in the file that is missing not being produced in the build as the comment above line 270 mentions.

If this is a common thing we can just add a || true to the end so it doesn't cause the build to fail for people who don't want debugging turned on.