Package Details: linux-lqx 6.19.13.lqx1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, NTSYNC-MODULE, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 168
Popularity: 0.64
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-04-20 16:32 (UTC)

Dependencies (21)

Required by (13)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 123 Next › Last »

crud commented on 2025-03-04 08:06 (UTC)

Someone managed to collect the kernel 6.13.5? I can't do it

ERROR: modpost: "preempt_model_lazy" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "preempt_model_lazy" [fs/jbd2/jbd2.ko] undefined!
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:145: Module.symvers] Error 1
make[1]: *** [/media/files/linux_pkg/aur/linux-lqx/src/linux-6.13/Makefile:1932: modpost] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:251: __sub-make] Error 2

Use Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop) (PREEMPT), but the error is related to Scheder Controlled Preemption Model (Preempt_lazy)

Arch_User commented on 2024-06-03 03:19 (UTC)

@Damentz

Yes I read it. Yes i have it installed. And yes I have modprobed.db populated with modules. I have even used it with other kernels.

I am sorry I cannot take your condescending attitude anymore.

"Failure to read and follow the instructions ....." Seriously?

I know there's no guarantees and you're doing it for free. So don't take it to heart.

Let me reiterate before I leave this for good.

The ABS for the vanilla arch kernel, lts, rt etc etc work with the same process. This one does not.

damentz commented on 2024-06-03 02:22 (UTC)

@Arch_User, did you read the comments in full before using localmodcfg? Below are the sections that matter.

# Compile ONLY used modules to VASTLYreduce the number of modules built
# and the build time.
#
# To keep track of which modules are needed for your specific system/hardware,
# give module_db script a try: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/modprobed-db
# This PKGBUILD read the database kept if it exists
#
# More at this wiki page ---> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Modprobed-db
_localmodcfg=

And

  ### Optionally load needed modules for the make localmodconfig
  # See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/modprobed-db
  if [ -n "$_localmodcfg" ]; then
    if [ -f $HOME/.config/modprobed.db ]; then
      echo "Running Steven Rostedt's make localmodconfig now"
      make LSMOD=$HOME/.config/modprobed.db localmodconfig
    else
      echo "No modprobed.db data found"
      exit
    fi
  fi

Failure to read and follow the instructions will result in exactly what happened when you booted your kernel. This feature cannot be used properly without preparation on your end. And unfortunately, there's no real way to tell if you have, as a dangerously reduced set of modules and kernel features could be completely intentional depending on your use case.

At least I have the answer to the question of "What's the difference between the builds". The answer is "No difference (probably) if you ignore the options in the pkgbuild"

Correct, the defaults are used for the binary repository. All other features you see are for niche use cases and experimentation. They're a convenience if you know why you're using them and need them for any reason.

Arch_User commented on 2024-06-03 01:48 (UTC)

@damentz

Why does the the PKGBUILD have _localmodcfg= ?

If it's not meant to be used, why is it even there?

The PKGBUILD does not say anything about not using it either.

By default it tries to build over 6000 modules.

Is that the prefered method? The PKGBUILD should at least say so.

And as stated before, I tried many times before posting anything here.

Other than the patches/scripts, the PKGBUILD is very much the same for the default Arch kernel PKGBUILD from the ABS. Which works flawlessly.

I will try to build the "default" as you suggested. I will check in later.

And again no. I am not using this as tech support. I am talking about the options provided in the PKGBUILD that fail. If it wasnt obvious before, it should be now. I have been solving the problems on my own.

At least I have the answer to the question of "What's the difference between the builds". The answer is "No difference (probably) if you ignore the options in the pkgbuild"

damentz commented on 2024-06-02 22:33 (UTC)

When using the localmodconfig option, it does not set CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437(This was causing problems with efi)

It should go without saying, if you change the config your "warranty" is voided. You're on your own as soon as you deviate from the defaults. There's a reason the prebuilt binary works, it uses the default configuration defined in the PKGBUILD.

it's also doing this CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_ACTIVATION_TRIGGER="/sbin/init", which is different from CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_ACTIVATION_TRIGGER="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd"

By default, /sbin/init is a symlink to /usr/lib/systemd/systemd.

I have now got it now to mount efi and get to graphical environment by manually setting config options. But still have problems with Network and mounting other filesystems. Still probably missing config options.

Your problems are self inflicted. If the defaults don't work, I'm happy to help, but you're turning off config options then surprised when things don't work.

I am not using the comment section as tech support. Please do not make insinuations.

Yes you are, you are asking for support for mistakes you're making. The issue is you think it's the PKGBUILD's fault when you're the one making alterations by not using the Liquorix config unaltered.

Arch_User commented on 2024-06-02 21:20 (UTC)

@Damentz

I am not using the comment section as tech support. Please do not make insinuations.

I am reporting problems with the package/build.

Here are more concrete examples:

When using the localmodconfig option, it does not set CONFIG_NLS_CODEPAGE_437(This was causing problems with efi)

The only drm related config it sets is CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_ORIENTATION_QUIRKS=y

it's also doing this CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_ACTIVATION_TRIGGER="/sbin/init"

which is different from CONFIG_SECURITY_TOMOYO_ACTIVATION_TRIGGER="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd"

I have now got it now to mount efi and get to graphical environment by manually setting config options. But still have problems with Network and mounting other filesystems. Still probably missing config options.

I have not encountered these issues with other kernels that I have compiled.

I will take note of Building in a clean environment. But I dont see how it affects the settings I mentioned.

damentz commented on 2024-06-02 17:10 (UTC)

The liquorix.net build is a clean room docker build of the package without any previous state.

Arch_User: You are the only person having issues with the AUR build, so something on your system is different that is causing the failure. I recommend you try building from a fresh install, from the official Arch Linux docker image, or from a chroot: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot.

The comment section for this package is not a technical support forum, so please use the Arch Linux forums if you continue to have issues.

Arch_User commented on 2024-06-02 16:59 (UTC)

It still wasn't working with the previous 2 updates. Was still messing up EFI and DRM.

This time with 6.9.3, it fails with all dkms modules. Won't even build them.

I have 6.9.3.arch1-1 custom compiled and working. But the same doesn't happen with this lqx kernel.

The question is: What's the difference between this AUR package/PKGBUILD and the one from liquorix.net? That one at least works. What config/scripts/sources are used there, such that it works there but not here?

Arch_User commented on 2024-05-28 15:10 (UTC)

@damentz There is nothing wrong with my initramfs, It works with every other custom kernel I have compiled and currently running. I also have liquorix installed from liquorix.net, that one works fine as well.

This one compiles fine, but works only partially.

There is something wrong with the scripts/patches that makes it fail with nvidia,nfs,network manager etc etc.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 123 Next › Last »