Package Details: linux-lqx 6.9.5.lqx1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: UKSMD-BUILTIN, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 159
Popularity: 1.87
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-17 13:45 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (11)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 121 Next › Last »

Arch_User commented on 2024-05-28 08:33 (UTC)

Can someone confirm that this works on Arch with Nvidia? I have tried several times but it just doesn't work. It fails to mount stuff, fails with efi, fails with nfs, fails with Network Manager and fails to start gui with nvidia modules.

Yes I have built the dkms modules with the liquorix kernel. Lsmod shows them loaded, but nothing happens. It stops after graphical.target. You can ctrl+alt+f2/3/4/5/6 but not 7

archdevlab commented on 2024-05-26 03:48 (UTC)

Hi while Lqx and Zen kernel patches are almost the same what about the config you use. His the config from liquorix package optimized for Archlinux? What would be the main difference? Thanks!

damentz commented on 2024-01-15 16:36 (UTC)

@xiota that's a red herring, htmldocs just creates html documentation using sphinx. The non html files are still there and are perfectly usable and preferred by many.

xiota commented on 2024-01-13 03:43 (UTC)

linux-lqx-docs needs to be removed from pkgname array when _htmldocs_enable is empty.

vlad1.96 commented on 2024-01-07 22:27 (UTC)

@damentz yes, I confirm, everything has become fine.

In addition to this, I did not write about it, but the warning disappeared when generating the UKI.

This warning didn't affect anything, and there was nothing in the logs, so I didn't think it was necessary to write about it earlier.

Thank you very much @damentz!

Anarconda commented on 2024-01-07 20:41 (UTC)

Everything seems to be ok with latest version

┌─[21:36:28]─[root@Gaia-E]
└──> amarcord #  dmesg | grep jitter
┌─[✗]─[21:36:32]─[root@Gaia-E]
└──> amarcord #  dmesg | grep bpf
[    0.375484] LSM: initializing lsm=capability,yama,bpf
[    3.144390] systemd[1]: bpf-lsm: LSM BPF program attached
amarcord # 

Thank you very much. Regards.

damentz commented on 2024-01-07 19:51 (UTC)

Right, please try the latest kernel. The previous one needed resolve_btfids included in the package for DKMS to build out-of-tree kernels correctly. Latest kernel now includes it.

Anarconda commented on 2024-01-07 19:12 (UTC)

I built the kernel from AUR and the problem with the display manager is what @vlad1.96 says there's not nvidia.ko.* not in /lib/modules/.

vlad1.96 commented on 2024-01-07 19:03 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-07 19:14 (UTC) by vlad1.96)

@Anarconda @damentz hid_bpf error and bpf-lsm failed disappear and system is booting (except nvidia), but the nvidia dkms module is not installed.

Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.6.10-lqx1-3-lqx (x86_64)

Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/make.log for more information.

==> WARNING: `dkms install --no-depmod nvidia/545.29.06 -k 6.6.10-lqx1-3-lqx' exited 10

https://pastebin.com/E0eWsMHy

if my localization interferes with reading. I can change it to English and repeat it again