Package Details: linux-lqx 6.10.10.lqx2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-lqx
Description: The Linux Liquorix kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://liquorix.net/
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: UKSMD-BUILTIN, VHBA-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 159
Popularity: 0.31
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-15 19:57 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (11)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 121 Next › Last »

sir_lucjan commented on 2017-09-26 07:53 (UTC)

I'll update linux-lqx tomorrow.

sir_lucjan commented on 2017-09-17 09:06 (UTC)

@DungSherlock: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=219904

DungSherlock commented on 2017-09-16 23:59 (UTC)

>>> Updating module dependencies. Please wait ... depmod: ERROR: Bad version passed %KERNVER% error: command failed to execute correctly How to fix this!?

sir_lucjan commented on 2017-09-16 09:23 (UTC)

damentz: I afraid I can't -I can add an info.

damentz commented on 2017-09-16 03:49 (UTC)

@DungSherlock gpg --recv-keys 79BE3E4300411886 @sirlucjan Maybe we can add this part to the pkgbuild?

DungSherlock commented on 2017-09-16 03:27 (UTC)

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... linux-4.12.tar ... FAILED (unknown public key 79BE3E4300411886) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build linux-lqx.

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-09-13 23:29 (UTC)

@damentz Thanks ! I remove elevator=bfq for linux-lqx as well as linux-lts-ck 4.9 I have the same dmesg as yours, which bfq-sq is the default io scheduler.

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-09-13 23:29 (UTC)

@damentz Thanks ! I remove elevator=bfq for linux-lqx as well as linux-lts-ck 4.9 I have the same dmesg as yours, which bfq-sq is the default io scheduler.

damentz commented on 2017-09-13 23:22 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-13 23:27 (UTC) by damentz)

@liubenyuan The parameter "elevator=bfq" probably doesn't do what you think. The 'bfq' IO scheduler is now used for mainline BFQ in the blk-mq subsystem, and is selected by through some simple logic in the code, overriding what you pick. Also, the 'elevator' parameter only affects legacy block. For 4.12, I switched from blk-mq back to blk-sq (legacy block) due to issues with suspend on 4.12. In order to get bfq working, I backported bfq-sq (the new names for bfq on blk-sq). So in order to get the same behavior, which is already default, you must add "elevator=bfq-sq" for now. This will probably change though, so I recommend not adding any explicit elevator on Liquorix since this is subject to change kernel version to kernel version as bugs are fixed. Also note, you can see which elevator is default by checking dmesg. However, the output in dmesg does not differentiate between blk-mq and blk-sq, so you'll need to do your research if you have any problems: $ dmesg | grep 'io scheduler' [ 9.418222] io scheduler noop registered [ 9.418222] io scheduler deadline registered [ 9.418238] io scheduler cfq registered [ 9.418239] io scheduler mq-deadline registered [ 9.418239] io scheduler kyber registered [ 9.418252] io scheduler bfq registered [ 9.418263] io scheduler bfq-sq registered (default)

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 121 Next › Last »