Package Details: octopi-dev 0.10.0-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: octopi-dev
Description: A powerful Pacman frontend using Qt5 libs
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: octopi
Provides: octopi, octopi-cachecleaner, octopi-repoeditor
Submitter: matmoul
Maintainer: matmoul
Last Packager: matmoul
Votes: 300
Popularity: 39.09
First Submitted: 2019-07-29 21:29
Last Updated: 2020-08-11 20:33

Dependencies (12)

Required by (3)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

matmoul commented on 2020-07-21 20:21

Version 0.10.0 is out, you can now use the octopi package...

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

matmoul commented on 2020-07-21 20:21

Version 0.10.0 is out, you can now use the octopi package...

MikeDee commented on 2020-01-01 16:23

I tried pikaur but that quit working with octopi, so I switched to pacaur. I'll have to try regular octopi, but suspect this problem only occurs with octopi-dev.

matmoul commented on 2020-01-01 02:50

@MikeDee octopi-dev is updated regulary from the last commit of the octopi project (it's a dev project, not stable).

Do you have tryied with an other aurhelper?

This issue seem not relevant to the package but with the project... Try to take a look at the project page :

MikeDee commented on 2019-12-31 18:34

I'm getting this error message every time I close the window after updating a package from the AUR. "Canceling the running transaction may damage your system. Do you really want to quit?" I'm using pacaur with Octopi-dev.

matmoul commented on 2019-11-18 12:07

@kinoe Thanks for your return but it seem not a packaging issue...

Try to open an issue on

kinoe commented on 2019-11-18 06:10

@matmoul thanks for your work. Terminal looks like this: It seems octopi-dev is using xterm (export TERM=xterm)? In bash i'm using powerline as a statusline plugin thats seen in the xterminal

matmoul commented on 2019-10-20 20:57

@egrupled After investigation, I've used the manjaro PKGBUILD, I'll remove clang for the next release.

egrupled commented on 2019-10-19 12:28

@matmoul I don't see clang mentioned in upstream PKGBUILD:

matmoul commented on 2019-10-18 23:45

@egrupled For clang, I've started with the PKGBUILD of the official project... I don't know if clang is needed, need investigation, thanks...

egrupled commented on 2019-10-18 10:09

@matmoul I have another question - why clang?