Package Details: sklauncher-bin 3.2.8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sklauncher-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sklauncher-bin
Description: Secure and modern Minecraft Launcher
Upstream URL: https://skmedix.pl
Licenses: Apache-2.0, LicenseRef-SKlauncher
Conflicts: sklauncher, sklauncher-git
Provides: sklauncher
Submitter: bemxio
Maintainer: bemxio
Last Packager: bemxio
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.067633
First Submitted: 2023-09-30 22:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-17 10:27 (UTC)

Dependencies (3)

Required by (0)

Sources (3)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

bemxio commented on 2024-01-20 08:35 (UTC)

@MeFinity Thanks, just updated the package. SKlauncher devs really can't decide how they want to store their binaries. :^)

MeFinity commented on 2024-01-20 07:48 (UTC)

https://skmedix.pl/bin/skl/3.2/SKlauncher-3.2.5.jar is now invalid, use https://skmedix.pl/bin/skl/3.2.5/SKlauncher-3.2.5.jar

bemxio commented on 2023-12-20 17:34 (UTC)

@nonetl2004 Sorry for the delay, thank you for bringing this to my attention!

nonetl2004 commented on 2023-12-20 05:03 (UTC)

@bemxio They updated the URL

bemxio commented on 2023-12-06 22:53 (UTC)

@stingraykiwi I've thought about it for a while, and decided to include the ToS in a LICENSE file, adding custom:SKlauncher as a 2nd license in the PKGBUILD, as well as including a post-install script that informs the user about the ToS. Thank you for reaching out with this problem! In case someone finds something non-compliant to the general guidelines here, feel free to reach out too, I wanna try keeping my AUR packages as standard as possible.

stingraykiwi commented on 2023-12-06 21:36 (UTC)

@bemxio I think it would suffice to simply mention it PKGBUILD file, sort of resembling F-Droid's anti-features warning. For example license=("Apache-2.0, Non-free") or something like that.

bemxio commented on 2023-12-06 19:20 (UTC)

@stingraykiwi Ah, I see. Sure, it is possible, but what way to include it would be the best? A seperate LICENSE file in the package itself that would be copied to /usr/share/licenses? I am not sure, thus I'm open to ideas :)

stingraykiwi commented on 2023-12-06 12:29 (UTC)

@bemxio I understand Apache is not copylefted and is permissive. However, this software relies on an online service which is not free (has EULA https://skmedix.pl/terms). Would it be possible to specify multiple licenses, first for binary and second for the service?

bemxio commented on 2023-12-05 14:16 (UTC)

@stingraykiwi I thought that too at first, but when I opened the SKlauncher.jar file in search of a license, it turns out it is licensed as Apache version 2.0, thus I've set it as Apache-2.0 in the package as well. I also did some research about the license, and it turns out you can release an Apache-licensed binary, without releasing the source code. I know that the LICENSE file inside the .jar might just be a placeholder for the devs, but it's the only information I could find about how SKlauncher is licensed.

stingraykiwi commented on 2023-12-05 10:08 (UTC)

Please change license to proprietary.

1 2 Next › Last »