Arch Linux User Repository

use always the latest jre if is possible. in case if 6.3.0, can run in jre17

setting it in https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/stm32cubemx.sh?h=stm32cubemx#n2 (hardcoded path instead use archlinux-java) for example

@sl1pkn07 Thanks for your comment. What changes do you want to propose?

hi- i think is possible use jre17 with this

/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/bin/java \\\n --module-path /usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.controls.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.fxml.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.web.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.graphics.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.base.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-17-openjdk/lib/javafx.media.jar \\\n --add-modules javafx.controls,javafx.fxml,javafx.web \\\n --add-exports javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.text=ALL-UNNAMED \\\n --add-exports javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.scene.text=ALL-UNNAMED \\\n --add-opens javafx.graphics/javafx.scene.text=ALL-UNNAMED \\\n --add-opens javafx.graphics/com.sun.javafx.text=ALL-UNNAMED

i have used this with stm32cubeprog without issues

maybe you can adapt it to this package

EDIT: tested with plain openjdk17 without module-path and foo (posted above). seems works without problem

Thanks for updating. Had Arduino IDE installed also which requires java-runtime=8. Had to run archlinux-java and set the JRE version to be JRE11.

There's a mention about the Java version requirements in the release notes, section 1.2. Up to version 6.2.0 there were a lot of constraints, basically only 64-bit Java 8 and 11 were supported. Since then they started shipping their own Java runtime, currently AdoptOpenJDK 11.

IMHO depending on java-runtime=11 would be the correct fix even if it's a bit annoying. It's more annoying to have an application that seems to work but is broken in subtle ways.

@H0lmEd I fixed it by also installing the jre11 package 'jre11-openjdk'

@laserk3000 Thanks for maintaining!

Latest 6.3.0 update causes STM32CubeMX to no longer launch.

"Please install Java JRE 11.0.10 64-Bit or a more recent version"

Can the Dependencies be updated to reflect this?

Hello @laserk3000, just letting you know that version 6.3.0 was released.

Thanks for maintaining.

Hello @laserk, just letting you know that version 6.2.1 was released.

Thanks for maintaining.

Any suggestion how to fix this problem? Sure I could add a warning but I guess not everyone will read it. On the other hand pinning a certain java version and implementation as suggested is problematic and will break the app for many people.