Search Criteria
Package Details: liblxqt-git 2.0.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/liblxqt-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | liblxqt-git |
Description: | Common base library for LXQt components. |
Upstream URL: | https://lxqt-project.org |
Licenses: | LGPL-2.1-only |
Conflicts: | liblxqt |
Provides: | liblxqt |
Submitter: | jleclanche |
Maintainer: | yan12125 (pmattern) |
Last Packager: | pmattern |
Votes: | 52 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2013-10-24 00:54 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-24 09:24 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- kwindowsystem (kwindowsystem-gitAUR)
- libqtxdg-gitAUR
- libxss
- polkit-qt6 (polkit-qt6-gitAUR)
- qt6-base (qt6-base-gitAUR, qt6-base-headlessAUR)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR) (make)
- lxqt-build-tools-gitAUR (make)
- qt6-tools (make)
Required by (16)
- lxqt-about-git
- lxqt-admin-git
- lxqt-appswitcher (requires liblxqt)
- lxqt-config-git
- lxqt-connman-applet-git (requires liblxqt)
- lxqt-globalkeys-git
- lxqt-labwc-session-git (requires liblxqt)
- lxqt-notificationd-git
- lxqt-openssh-askpass-git
- lxqt-panel-git
- lxqt-plugin-wingmenu-git (requires liblxqt)
- lxqt-policykit-git
- lxqt-powermanagement-git
- lxqt-session-git
- lxqt-sudo-git
- qps-git
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
pmattern commented on 2024-05-07 19:21 (UTC)
Speaking of "comparing" I was actually thinking of easily comparing VCS and release package with an AUR helper like yaourt.
But actually that's not really the point anyway.
Looking through this package's commit history suggests the epoch was unneeded right from the beginning. It shouldn't have been introduced in the first place.
Also, it's inconsistent with all other LXQt-related VCS packages.
And it does not make any sense at all to stick with something completely faulty, just because its removal may cause some temporary glitches.
So sorry, but I for one am still completely against re-introducing it.
yan12125 commented on 2024-05-01 06:32 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. As liblxqt-git and liblxqt are different packages from the perspective of pacman, I assume "comparison" means manual comparisons by human or by scripts? In those cases, epochs can be easily ignored.
pmattern commented on 2024-04-26 20:58 (UTC)
Yes, removing variable epoch may trick users into missing updates. But this only happens, if they do not really pay attention and e. g. blindly follow some AUR helper. This should be avoided anyway. And in particular, I wouldn't expect it to be a problem for the special breed that VCS package users are.
The variable itself on the other hand is right now not only useless but can have undesired effects like preventing reasonable version comparison between VCS and release package.
So when removing it, I was fully aware of possible pitfalls but believing that the pros outweigh the cons. And tbh. I still think so.
Maybe we can, as a comprise, add a temporarily pinned comment pointing users to the removal.
yan12125 commented on 2024-04-26 14:40 (UTC)
pmattern: many thanks for updates, but I'm not sure if it's a good idea to drop eopch. Users may always have a newer version than the one on AUR, so they may not get future updates.
isf63 commented on 2023-10-20 11:55 (UTC)
kwindowsystem
is nowkwindowsystem5
- which prevents the buildyan12125 commented on 2017-10-15 10:15 (UTC)
ahrs commented on 2017-06-12 10:25 (UTC)
tdy commented on 2017-01-16 04:40 (UTC)
yan12125 commented on 2016-08-03 17:09 (UTC)
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »