Search Criteria
Package Details: balena-etcher 2:2.1.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/balena-etcher.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | balena-etcher |
Description: | Flash OS images to SD cards & USB drives, safely and easily |
Upstream URL: | https://balena.io/etcher |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Conflicts: | etcher, etcher-bin, etcher-git |
Submitter: | gin078 |
Maintainer: | zhullyb (Clansty, sukanka, lilac) |
Last Packager: | sukanka |
Votes: | 263 |
Popularity: | 0.82 |
First Submitted: | 2019-05-13 11:35 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-03-01 03:02 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- electron34 (electron34-binAUR)
- nodejs-lts-jod
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- jq (jq-gitAUR, jaq-binAUR) (make)
- moreutils (moreutils-go-binAUR) (make)
- npm (corepackerAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- libnotify (libnotify-gitAUR) (optional) – for notifications
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 30 Next › Last »
dimon7388 commented on 2021-03-04 16:39 (UTC)
Получил вот такую ошибку: Run
npm audit
for details. npm notice npm-shrinkwrap.json up to date make: *** [Makefile:89: electron-develop] Ошибка 1Как решить эту проблему?
Spixmaster commented on 2021-03-03 18:44 (UTC)
I get the same error as SArpnt:
make: *** [Makefile:89: electron-develop] Error 1
haibane commented on 2021-02-22 20:17 (UTC)
I've been getting this for months. ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading etcher git repo Aborting...
Any suggestions? I've tried clean builds and recently uninstall/reinstall.
SArpnt commented on 2021-02-16 00:18 (UTC)
@gin078 i found out it's just an issue on my setup, i still don't know what though. i was able to build fine on my laptop.
gin078 commented on 2021-02-15 13:22 (UTC)
@SArpnt are you still having issues building? I was unable to reproduce in a clean build environment.
SArpnt commented on 2021-02-06 23:18 (UTC)
when i try to build 1.5.116 i get:
1.5.115 worked fine for me, is there anything i'm doing wrong?
BenTheTechGuy commented on 2020-12-01 02:57 (UTC)
Could you add i686, armv7h, and aarch64 to the arch section? The package can also be built on these architectures.
elhoce commented on 2020-11-04 19:17 (UTC)
After skipping sha256sum checks, package is working. So the issue comes from sha256sum signature provided in PKGBUILD
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 30 Next › Last »