| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/llvm-minimal-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | llvm-minimal-git |
| Description: | C language family frontend for LLVM (trimmed down git version) |
| Upstream URL: | https://llvm.org/ |
| Licenses: | Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception |
| Conflicts: | clang, compiler-rt |
| Provides: | clang, clang-analyzer, clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt |
| Submitter: | Lone_Wolf |
| Maintainer: | Lone_Wolf |
| Last Packager: | Lone_Wolf |
| Votes: | 5 |
| Popularity: | 0.004077 |
| First Submitted: | 2019-05-14 19:32 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-09-07 14:04 (UTC) |
ld.lld: error: Invalid record (Producer: 'LLVM18.0.0' Reader: 'LLVM 16.0.6')
It looks for the llvm18 linker but only finds the llvm16 linker.
This package builts llvm itself, also compiler-rt, clang-tools-extra and clang but not lld .
I could add lld, but that would cause file conflicts with repo lld.
Best option might be adding another sub package, how important is this for you ?
can't compile linux-clear with that, any ideas? https://paste.rs/ImWDd.txt
I managed to port the method used in repo packages to work with gnu make.
Build now goes a bit faster and binary size has been reduced a lot. see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=287409
You are referring to /usr/bin/amdgpu-arch & /usr/bin/nvptx-arch ?
repo-llvm / clang doesn't appear to have those files, emscripten & rocm-llvm do but neither has a separate clang package.
Will have to think about this (and possibly reconsider using the ninja targets method to only build what's really used).
Hi you should move amdgpu-arch and nvptx-arch to clang package
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/clang/tools
Thanks!
The method to reduce what is getting build uses `ninja -t targets' . That option appears to be exclusive to ninja, for now I'm skipping it.
The commands to split clang files do seem to work, unfortunately they complicate the PKGBUILD further.
I'm currently looking into building from snapshots to see if having separate (simple) PKGBUILDs for llvm, clang & spirv-llvm-translator is worth the effort.
Hi I forked your llvm-minimal-git package and split clang from llvm.
You can take a look : https://github.com/blacksky3/llvm-minimal-git.git
I am running with this package for 1 week now with no issues
I looked at repo packages requiring clang and/or llvm at runtime and found very few require llvm at runtime, much more require llvm at buildtime but not at runtime.
There appear to be benefits for llvm-minimal-git users to split clang from llvm. Doing that will complicate the package_llvm-minimal-git function further, not sure how bad that will be. Need to think about this more.
Hi I was looking at the git history of the main LLVM/CLANG PKGBUILDs and did not see that line. The clang14 PKGBUILD was uploaded sith that line when looking to the git history. I think they added that line to ship very minimal clang package, because when I look to the PKGBUILD clang14 dont even ship clang-tools-extra stuff. That line remove some analyze tools that I think is usefull for users.
My question is : Would it benefit users to trim down some tools and functionnality provided by clang in llvm-minimal-git?
Also thanks for your response about optimizing python stuff in clang! Thanks
That line is not present in any llvm 15 PKGBUILDs, so the decision to remove those was reverted.
It helps to know that scan-build & scan-view are part of clang tools.
As for the optimize commands : They have never been used in llvm-minimal-git since it started in 2019 and no one has ever complained about it.
Both the archwiki python packaging guidelines and the python page don't mention those commands. Unless they're proven to be beneficial I treat them as a relic that was useful in the past but is no longer.
Pinned Comments
Lone_Wolf commented on 2022-11-02 11:39 (UTC)
During building you may encounter lots of coredumps, slowing build down or even dramatically reducing the responsiveness of your system.
See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Core_dump for solutions/workarounds .
Lone_Wolf commented on 2020-08-22 12:30 (UTC) (edited on 2020-08-22 12:31 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
Archlinux currently has 3 llvm git implementations
this package
llvm-git
packages created & maintained by Lordheavy, an arch developer
Lone_Wolf commented on 2019-08-25 12:39 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-30 21:15 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
Why does this package exist ?
Llvm & aur llvm-git are intended to provide a full development environment of llvm/clang suite that can replace eachother completely (aur llvm-git adds some xtra functionality)
llvm-minimal-git is a stripped-down llvm trunk build with these goals :
Some of the things that are stripped out :
Maintainers (and users) should only depend on llvm-miminal-git after verifying it satisfies what they need.
Lone_Wolf commented on 2019-08-21 13:51 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-24 20:50 (UTC) by Lone_Wolf)
When building this you are likely to see test failures in terminal output / logs.
The command used for the tests has been changed to continue regardless of failures. Incase you don't want to run the tests you can use --nocheck option of makepkg.