Package Details: davinci-resolve 15.3.1-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL:
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: satriani
Last Packager: satriani
Votes: 33
Popularity: 3.599522
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57
Last Updated: 2019-04-17 19:11

Pinned Comments

satriani commented on 2018-09-12 08:02

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: Thank you!

You can check if you have a working configuration here:

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here:

And for current studio beta here:


Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

Dinglydo commented on 2019-04-19 04:29

Sorry! I accidentally flagged it, you may ignore it.

nixit commented on 2019-04-12 16:39

It looks like the latest non beta version of DaVinci-Resolve is 15.3.1, this install only references 15.3.


FYI... I ended up downgrading from 15.3.1 and re-installing 15.3, when I had 15.3.1 loaded doing nothing, my systems' fans would kick into overdrive. 15.3 doesn't do this.

antechnologic commented on 2019-04-08 18:50

With the release of the beta of v.16 the link you're directed towards has no download link for v. 15 anymore. You should probably tell people to head to this URL instead where the download can be found:

Mark1 commented on 2019-04-07 13:40

==> ERROR: was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.

raimondl commented on 2019-04-06 10:06

update needed, DaVinci Resolve version 15.3.1 has been released as of 2019-04-06

wallena3 commented on 2019-04-03 00:17

Can not call fcitx input method in davinci such as fcitx-googlepinyin.Is there any solution?

satriani commented on 2019-03-26 20:07

@alex.forencich: Fixed, thank you!

alex.forencich commented on 2019-03-20 21:28

The package has an extra softlink in it, which is only valid if you have a user 'alex' on your system. That one had me going for a while as it was almost correct on my machine and I definitely didn't make it myself.

satriani commented on 2019-03-10 10:35

Actually, there was a typo. Fixed. Thank you!

Tim54000 commented on 2019-03-09 18:06

Sorry, I should have expressed myself better. I am talking about this condition but you use the lognam command (which does not exist) instead of logname. I'm new to Linux and at the moment I don't have the knowledge to tell you if the condition is useful or not but enough to make sure you made a typo. Nice day for you!