Package Details: davinci-resolve 18.6.6-4

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: satriani
Last Packager: satriani
Votes: 134
Popularity: 3.71
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-19 20:45 (UTC)

Dependencies (24)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:15 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-15 14:16 (UTC) by satriani)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 .. 52 Next › Last »

fclad commented on 2023-01-11 20:27 (UTC)

I am facing the following issue:

/nvault/tmp/davinci-resolve/src/squashfs-root/libs/libQtCore.so.4’
maximum file size exceeded
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
    Aborting...
error: failed to build 'davinci-resolve-18.1.2-1':
error: packages failed to build: davinci-resolve-18.1.2-

the drive where I am compiling is not full. Also tried to do it in tmpfs. Any clues?

pedrogabriel commented on 2022-12-30 03:24 (UTC)

I runned namcap in the builded package and the updated list of references acording with the package looks like ('glu' 'gtk2' 'libpng12' 'fuse2' 'opencl-driver' 'qt5-x11extras' 'qt5-svg' 'qt5-webkit' 'qt5-webengine' 'qt5-websockets' 'qt5-quickcontrols2' 'qt5-multimedia' 'libxcrypt-compat' 'xmlsec' 'libnice' 'java-runtime' 'ffmpeg4.4' 'gst-plugins-bad-libs' 'python-numpy' 'tbb' 'apr-util' 'luajit').

thedanbob commented on 2022-12-19 14:43 (UTC)

It looks like Davinci now bundles openssl so the openssl-1.0 dependency should be unnecessary. The symlinks to libcrypto.so and libssl.so were disabled a few versions ago: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=davinci-resolve&id=9eb69f03d54a95ba7228c5f177cb4ea3f065654b

xiashali commented on 2022-12-16 10:03 (UTC) (edited on 2022-12-16 10:06 (UTC) by xiashali)

openssl-1.0 dropped

victorz commented on 2022-11-21 20:29 (UTC)

I'm really curious to know why the checksums fail, release after release. Is there a problem with the method here? Why would we need to fix this, per person? AUR helpers fail here, obviously.

Do you need help? How can I help? Is there a problem? Let us know, please reach out, because this is frustrating.

radumitrescu commented on 2022-11-21 06:04 (UTC)

Thanks @hyun007, that did it.

Roken commented on 2022-11-16 17:21 (UTC)

For info - updpkgsums doesn't work - you have to amend the PKGBUILD

rokam commented on 2022-11-16 14:37 (UTC)

Please fix checksum.

Jecht commented on 2022-11-15 13:43 (UTC)

hyun007 solution works for me, thanks bro