Package Details: davinci-resolve 18.6.6-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: satriani
Last Packager: satriani
Votes: 130
Popularity: 2.41
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-24 21:14 (UTC)

Dependencies (24)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:15 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-15 14:16 (UTC) by satriani)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 .. 50 Next › Last »

satriani commented on 2019-01-10 20:45 (UTC)

@Ashark Thank you for your support. I already started before the holiday. I just had to change a bit and test it. Anyway thank you again.

Ashark commented on 2019-01-10 20:20 (UTC)

@satriani Why do you ignore my pkgbuild? I published it even before new year and it solves problems, that you reimplemented again now. You can see revisions in my gist if you wish. There are todos remained (about checking dependency list and some other minor) but the pkgbuild works as it should.

satriani commented on 2019-01-10 18:24 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-10 18:24 (UTC) by satriani)

Unfortunately, there is a permission issue, so there will be a new update soon. If anyone finds any other bugs, report them here before updating. Many thanks.

Ashark commented on 2019-01-10 06:25 (UTC)

@satriani, as I already told you, I have prepared a working pkgbuild: https://gist.github.com/Ashark/a194db36c8acd53f3cff496b617628fb You need just upload it here.

@everybody: If you have an integrated amd gpu, please share your results here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=56878&p=456990#p456924 I have successfully started dr on nvidia and amd gpus, but not intel.

satriani commented on 2019-01-09 17:37 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-09 17:37 (UTC) by satriani)

I'm back \o/

But I see the mood here is quite cloudy °_°

I'll take the case tomorrow. I'm too tired today, sorry.

ncoder-2 commented on 2019-01-08 23:34 (UTC)

Seems unmaintained, I now manually install the .run file myself from BMD's website. Should we declare the package as orphaned so someone can take over and maintain it?

bartus commented on 2019-01-08 19:37 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-09 14:00 (UTC) by bartus)

Patch to incorporate xorriso unpacking routine. 

curl https://pastebin.com/raw/ERgW0Zcb|patch -Np1

codibit commented on 2019-01-08 19:19 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-08 19:34 (UTC) by codibit)

@bartus it is possible to extract the package, please check the davinci-resolve-studio package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio/

The extracting method was mentioned in the blackmagicdesign forums and copied from the makeresolvedeb script.

I created a git branch for davinci-resolve from my davinci-resolve-studio github repo (basically removing studio specific stuff). Check it at https://github.com/codibit/davinci-resolve-studio/tree/non-studio you can download a snapshot at https://github.com/codibit/davinci-resolve-studio/archive/non-studio.zip

EDIT: I see you found it out while I was writting my comment :)

bartus commented on 2019-01-08 18:54 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-08 19:26 (UTC) by bartus)

Sadly the install bundle doesn't provide --extract-only option.

edit. Ok, I've got it [learn a bit about Appimage in the process] you can extract the run file with xorris

xorriso -osirrox on -indev DaVinci_Resolve_15.2.2_Linux.run -extract / ./unpack-DaVinci_Resolve_15.2.2_Linux

Vincintosh commented on 2019-01-05 17:43 (UTC)

Soo.. I managed to install it, here's my experience... I tried cloning the entire repository kindly linked by Ashark

git clone https://gist.github.com/Ashark/a194db36c8acd53f3cff496b617628fb

there will be a couple more files other than the PKGBUILD that are needed. Then I made a backup of the existing /opt/resolve folder, so that in case of braking it, I had the older version (I guess) still working.

sudo cp -R /opt/resolve /opt/resolve.bak

Then I went into the previously downloaded folder (I cloned it in my home/davinci)

cd ~/davinci/a194db36c8acd53f3cff496b617628fb

and made the package the usual AUR way

makepkg -si

then waited for it to make and compress the package. When I tried to install it I got a couple of errors. The first ones referred to the non existance of some files in /var/lib/pacman/local/davinci-resolve-15.2.2-2/. Maybe it was looking for some cached files, so I just erased this folder

sudo rm -Rf /var/lib/pacman/local/davinci-resolve-15.2.2-2/

and tried again installing the package with "sudo pacman -U PACKAGEPATH.tar.xz" but got other errors referring to already existing files (the old version was still there, maybe "pacman -U" doesn't just erase and replace it, or maybe it doesn't work with /opt software, i don't know). Anyway, I erased the old version (mantaining the backup)

sudo rm -Rf /opt/resolve sudo rm sudo rm /etc/xdg/menus/applicationsmerged/com.blackmagicdesign.resolve.menu

and tried again "sudo pacman -U PACKAGEPATH.tar.xz" and IT WORKED.

Remember: nVidia Optimus users (i.e. laptops with discrete nVidia GPUs) should always run this with optirun/primusrun in order to ensure best stability and performance.

@codibit I agree with you that this is not a trivial update, but there might be unexperienced people, maybe dealing the first time with this package, that could be demotivated into trying this awesome software by these errors. Many people like me rely on some software (like me) in order to keep using (Arch) Linux as their main OS. I do a lot of video editing and should switch to Mac OS/Windows as my main OS without this software working good :(

@everyone As I said in my previous comment, I'm not good with AUR maintaining stuff and I know almost NOTHING on how to update an AUR package for the community. Feel free to use this information to improve this package. Although I'm sure that the mantainers of this package will soon solve the issue, if needed, I can give further information on my machine/system or I'm here to help even with my small knowledge.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 .. 50 Next › Last »