Package Details: firefox-nightly 127.0a1+20240430.1+h650dda918743-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-nightly.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-nightly
Description: Development version of the popular Firefox web browser
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/channel/#nightly
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: MPL-2.0
Submitter: None
Maintainer: heftig
Last Packager: heftig
Votes: 608
Popularity: 0.010793
First Submitted: 2008-09-10 14:23 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-30 09:10 (UTC)

Dependencies (38)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

heftig commented on 2022-07-27 22:26 (UTC)

Instead of building this yourself, please use the repository from https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=117157.

Not only do you skip the very time-consuming builds, but the published package also has debug symbols at Mozilla's crash reports service, which helps tremendously with finding or filing bugs for any crashes you get.

I consider this the canonical firefox-nightly package for Arch Linux.

[heftig]
SigLevel = Optional
Server = https://pkgbuild.com/~heftig/repo/$arch

Alternatively, download Firefox Nightly straight from Mozilla, extract it to a writable place (e.g. ~/.local/firefox-nightly) and let it update itself using the integrated updater.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 56 Next › Last »

Archange commented on 2021-01-27 09:33 (UTC)

@pmarreck: This package does not build from source, it downloads prebuild artifacts from Mozilla. Those are only provided for i686 and x86_64. No one ever wanted to push a firefox-nightly source build, because you would have to rebuild constantly and it takes hour each time.

That being said there is a source package (with nightly builds, that I’ve been using for a long time now instead of this AUR package) on heftig repo at https://pkgbuild.com/~heftig/packages/firefox-nightly/.

pmarreck commented on 2021-01-15 17:56 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-15 17:58 (UTC) by pmarreck)

So I'm trying to build this on manjaro-aarch64. I added aarch64 to the allowed build architectures in PKGBUILD (because this usually works, I've built things from source before this way, although am generally new to Manjaro). I am erroring inside the package() function on the copy step: "cp: cannot stat 'firefox': No such file or directory" I added some debug commands prior to the error (pwd, ls -al etc.) and reran the build and yep, there's no "firefox" in there, which means... a previous step failed, but didn't error, or something? I'm not sure.

DuKol commented on 2021-01-15 08:11 (UTC)

Dear all, last two days I see the following error: ==> Updated version: firefox-nightly 86.0a1.20210114-1 ==> ERROR: A package has already been built. (use -f to overwrite) Even if I downloaded a new package and, for me, it is actually 2021-01-15: Extracting 20210115-firefox-86.0a1.en-US.linux-x86_64.tar.bz2 with bsdtar

The other days it was the same just different dates. Even if I delete everything and build a package, after installation it does not work correctly - it must be killed.

sperg512 commented on 2020-12-22 19:06 (UTC)

oh, I see. that's pretty odd but thanks

Archange commented on 2020-12-22 19:05 (UTC)

The latest version is retrieved by checking a particular text file upstream. Checksums are embedded in the PGP signature file, so they are retrieved with it, and verified using gpg.

sperg512 commented on 2020-12-22 19:01 (UTC)

that's weird, how does that even work?

Archange commented on 2020-12-22 19:00 (UTC)

@sperg512: They don’t change, see https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=firefox-nightly&id=7643c5788bb3555dc2d49ce8a757f55896d2d39d

sperg512 commented on 2020-12-22 18:57 (UTC)

@Archange even the sums?

Archange commented on 2020-12-22 10:01 (UTC)

@json: Extensions from packages are not compatible IIRC, because they wont be installed at the correct place, they actually requires firefox, not firefox-developer nor nightly.

@sperg512: Your script is indeed useless, because I’m changing even less than what @DaOfficial said, basically I’m only updating the _version line, everything else (including pkgver) is automated.

DaOfficialRolex commented on 2020-12-16 17:29 (UTC)

Hello if anyone is wondering how to update this pkgbuild on their own systems. As long as you have a x86_64 system (I assume i686 users won't have to change anything either but I don't a i686 system so I can't test that and know for sure.) all you have to do is update the _version line and the pkgver line. The sha512sums and pgpkeys haven't changed in anyway and it built fine on my system.