Package Details: linux-pf 6.11.pf4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-pf
Description: The pf-kernel and modules
Upstream URL: https://pfkernel.natalenko.name
Keywords: bbr bbr3 kernel ksm linux linux-pf pf-kernel uksm uksmd v4l2loopback zstd
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, linux-pf, NTFS3-MODULE, UKSMD-BUILTIN, V4L2LOOPBACK-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: nous
Maintainer: post-factum
Last Packager: post-factum
Votes: 209
Popularity: 0.22
First Submitted: 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-06 15:49 (UTC)

Dependencies (17)

Required by (14)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-08 14:21 (UTC) by post-factum)

Official binary builds for various x86_64 ISA levels are available here.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 .. 106 Next › Last »

nous commented on 2011-10-19 06:12 (UTC)

Yes. LZO compression with tuxonice broke at pf4. For people with less swap space than RAM (like myself) LZO's a must. Others should move to linux-pf anyway. To absolutely use the last kernel26-pf4, you can download the package tarball, change pf3 to pf4 in the PKGBUILD and build it with 'makepkg --skipinteg'.

shadowed87 commented on 2011-10-19 05:15 (UTC)

is it there any reason not to use 2.6.39-pf4 instead of pf3 ??

nous commented on 2011-10-08 17:53 (UTC)

I'm waiting for linux-pf to start working with lzo'ed tuxonice. Once that happens, I'll request deletion and transfer of comments/votes.

falconindy commented on 2011-10-08 17:29 (UTC)

Can this be deleted?

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-09-24 22:03 (UTC)

change link for: http://kernelorg.mirrors.tds.net/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-3.0.tar.bz2 thanks.

nous commented on 2011-08-31 17:50 (UTC)

3.0.3-pf incorporates the new aufs3 tree and the interactive cpufreq governor.

nous commented on 2011-08-29 09:04 (UTC)

Yeah, same here with lzo and lzf. See https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=977921#p977921 and https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=983362#p983362

aarone commented on 2011-08-29 06:23 (UTC)

I have an i686 machine (Atom N450, specifically), and I get -22 errors when trying to resume using lzo compression. Lzf also doesn't work (as some have reported it does) -- it yields an error code of -5 with a message about "decompression yielded XXXX bytes instead of 4096" (where XXXX is a number slightly less than 4096). This is with the latest version (3.0.2) of linux-pf. The last kernel version where suspend/resume consistently works for me is 2.6.37. 2.6.38 and .39 die silently on resume (some fiddling with transparent hugepages once made the problem seem to go away, I can't remember the details). And the 3.0 series has the -22 error.

nous commented on 2011-08-26 16:22 (UTC)

I just read a couple of threads over at the Gentoo forums and it would seem that the -22 decompression error only concerns x86_64 kernels. Can anyone on i686 confirm that? I only have access to 64bit boxes and they all fail. Also, someone reported that non-BFS kernels don't get that error...

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 .. 106 Next › Last »