Updated to current release.
RE skins not working:
It works for me without any of the symlinking/copying. Are you sure that's necessary? Or is just adding libglvnd
as a dependency enough?
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/minecraft-launcher.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | minecraft-launcher |
Description: | Official Minecraft Launcher |
Upstream URL: | https://mojang.com/ |
Keywords: | game minecraft |
Licenses: | All Rights Reserved |
Conflicts: | minecraft-launcher-beta |
Provides: | minecraft-launcher-beta |
Submitter: | shoghicp |
Maintainer: | MrAnno |
Last Packager: | MrAnno |
Votes: | 1096 |
Popularity: | 7.14 |
First Submitted: | 2017-01-18 14:17 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-06-07 18:27 (UTC) |
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 .. 51 Next › Last »
Updated to current release.
RE skins not working:
It works for me without any of the symlinking/copying. Are you sure that's necessary? Or is just adding libglvnd
as a dependency enough?
Hm, it is a popular packet and out of date for quite some time. :(
It would be very cool if you implemented the changes suggested by @chenjunyu19 into the PKGBUILD.
The latest version is now 2.1.2464. Change your PKGBUILD variables as follows: pkgver=2.1.12464 Change the first sha256sum to: 63bc6f0b8f8a387f7f49da8f75466502ef226777221e877e9c842b1a76702fcd
Accidentally deleted my previous comment. Basically said that that's all we need to do here as well, just the author isn't around to bump the version at the moment. I've emailed him and we'll see if he's able to update it.
Is there a reason we are not just modifying the version, like the GitKraken package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gitkraken/ , in the PKGBUILD?
A new version was just pushed. Until the AUR is updated, you can set the pkgver to 2.1.12308.
@Feakster This minecraft launcher isn't a jar file like the old one was, it's an Electron linux x86_64 executable. True enough that the jar file was more portable between architectures
The older version of this launcher at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft/ had arch=(any)
set in the PKGBUILD file. Is there a reason this build needs arch=('x86_64')
set? I thought part of the point of java was that it could be cross-platform and cross-architecture.
Pinned Comments
petr commented on 2021-10-08 09:04 (UTC)
The package version is the version of the launcher bootstrap - the part that actually downloads and updates the launcher.
That means the version number of the actual launcher (2.x.xxx) is different from the version here (9xx+) on a fundamental level, and should not be compared.
The package is outdated only when the bootstrap version you get here is different from the bootstrap version you would get from minecraft.net when using the raw tarball.