Given that you can't follow everyone's requests, you should follow the one that is objectively correct, i.e., mine. I'm sorry but whether pihole-ftl exposes the same features as dnsmasq is not something to be decided by democratic vote; it's easily checked by just calling both programs with --help
that it does not. And "this non-equivalent program should have provides=
and pollute /usr/bin/
with a symlink` is not a valid request.
If you read dnsmasq(8) for dhcp-host
and dhcp-range
you'll see that what you posted is not supported. (I should not have to tell the maintainer to RTFM, btw.) If you want to claim an interface prefix is supported, but just undocumented, feel free to point me to where in the source code it is parsed. In fact, the interface:
parameter to dhcp-range
was removed from dnsmasq in 2017.
Pinned Comments
max.bra commented on 2018-02-09 16:46 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-18 23:13 (UTC) by max.bra)
ArchLinux Pi-hole is not officially supported by Pi-hole project. In case of bugs and malfunctions please DO NOT file a report upstream.
First of all check if the wiki (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pi-hole) can help then ask here for assistance and tips.
When it will be excluded that the problem does not depend on ArchLinux we will file a bug upstream.