Package Details: connman-git 1.29.22.g71657ff-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: connman-git
Description: Wireless LAN network manager (git version)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: connman
Provides: connman
Submitter: None
Maintainer: taylorchu
Last Packager: taylorchu
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.000789
First Submitted: 2011-12-04 21:21
Last Updated: 2015-06-09 06:26

Required by (18)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

tehabe commented on 2016-10-11 11:30

Any reason why pptpclient is a dependency instead of a optional dependency?

GI_Jack commented on 2014-12-03 22:09

Makefile:589: recipe for target 'connman-dbus-glue.h' failed

gives some error about connman-dbus.xml.

build fails.

sekret commented on 2014-03-23 11:53

configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-threads

So this line can be removed

gothmog123 commented on 2013-12-22 01:35

I'm also interested in having this alongside netctl and was also wondering if this is going to be safe. Just want to have netctl for those times I might need to use a 3g dongle or pppoe adsl stuff.

WonderWoofy commented on 2013-11-27 04:16

taylorchu, thanks again for maintaining this package. I just want to point out (and it has already been mentioned by lobisquit) that you need to add gnutls to the depends. This is actually even reported by namcap.

firecat53 commented on 2013-09-09 00:56

Also need to add libtool as a makedepends.


lobisquit commented on 2013-06-14 09:18

gnutls should be added as a dependency: in my case connman doesn't work without it

WonderWoofy commented on 2013-05-31 14:46

taylorchu, the /bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin -> /usr/bin is near! This package needs to be updated so that it does not cause issues when the move takes place.

I fixed it up so that it will not f*ck up the move. Here it is:

WonderWoofy commented on 2013-04-17 14:28

Thanks for updating this taylorchu. I noticed that you removed the openresolv conflict (which allows me to have this installed in parallel w/ netctl). Are you aware of what the reason was for the openresolv conflict in the first place? I see no obvious consequences as of yet, and the files themselves don't conflict... so I haven't been able to figure that out. I am just kind of curious though if I am risking some kind of impending doom.

Thanks again for the adoption/update! It works great so far.

Anonymous comment on 2013-03-14 10:23

Seems like this package is unmaintained? The PKGBUILD is broken right now!