Package Details: davinci-resolve 20.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: LicenseRef-Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: Muflone
Last Packager: Muflone
Votes: 155
Popularity: 4.96
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-05-31 18:16 (UTC)

Dependencies (25)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

Muflone commented on 2025-01-26 00:55 (UTC)

IMPORTANT!

Since version 19.1.3-2 this package will not download automatically the source file from the upstream site.

To build this package you will need to manually download the file from https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion and place it in the same directory with the PKGBUILD.

This would reduce the mess in this package, making it more readable and clear. Also bypassing the required information from the upstream URL is not allowed in an automated way.

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:14 (UTC)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 60 Next › Last »

alex.forencich commented on 2019-03-20 21:28 (UTC)

The package has an extra softlink in it, which is only valid if you have a user 'alex' on your system. That one had me going for a while as it was almost correct on my machine and I definitely didn't make it myself.

satriani commented on 2019-03-10 10:35 (UTC)

Actually, there was a typo. Fixed. Thank you!

Tim54000 commented on 2019-03-09 18:06 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have expressed myself better. I am talking about this condition but you use the lognam command (which does not exist) instead of logname. I'm new to Linux and at the moment I don't have the knowledge to tell you if the condition is useful or not but enough to make sure you made a typo. Nice day for you!

satriani commented on 2019-03-09 15:56 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-09 15:58 (UTC) by satriani)

I thank you for your feedback and ask for a suggestion. Then I could write the condition like this:

if [ ! "$(lognam 2>&1 >/dev/null)" ]; then
    _user=$(logname)
    _group=$(id -g -n ${_user})
fi

Tim54000 commented on 2019-03-09 14:25 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-09 14:26 (UTC) by Tim54000)

The condition to use logname is always wrong because it is poorly written (introduced in #e55cae9d).

bartus commented on 2019-03-05 14:20 (UTC)

There is a problem with chroot build introduced in #7cf524bc commit. Basically, you can't use logname as there is no user present (null output, warning on stderr: logname: no login name). If you need to change file permissions, please do it in postinstall script.

Ashark commented on 2019-02-10 18:33 (UTC)

@Harpy1991 opencl-driver is already in the dependencies list.

Harpy1991 commented on 2019-02-10 18:30 (UTC)

i had to install opencl for it to work. it did not install automaticaly. but even the official read me that comes with it does not mentions you need it. i had to check the debug files.

you might as well do us the favor of add opencl to the dependencies to install this here. it was the opencl for my nvidia drivers, and its dependencies

codibit commented on 2019-02-04 09:04 (UTC)

The way I see the StartupWMClass thing, it is defined within the specification (https://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/desktop-entry-spec-latest.html) and might be useful for some use cases, while not producing negative effects for other ones. I added it to the studio version, as when run from the provided .desktop application link it is working properly. Let's not forget that there are many window managers and desktop environments.