Specifying the port # while importing the keys helped me:
gpg --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com:443 --search-keys 662E3CDD6FE329002D0CA5BB40339DD82B12EF16
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/librewolf-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | librewolf-bin |
Description: | Community-maintained fork of Firefox, focused on privacy, security and freedom. |
Upstream URL: | https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io/ |
Keywords: | browser web |
Licenses: | GPL, MPL, LGPL |
Conflicts: | librewolf |
Provides: | librewolf |
Submitter: | lsf |
Maintainer: | lsf |
Last Packager: | lsf |
Votes: | 407 |
Popularity: | 10.84 |
First Submitted: | 2019-06-16 13:12 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-15 09:43 (UTC) |
Specifying the port # while importing the keys helped me:
gpg --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com:443 --search-keys 662E3CDD6FE329002D0CA5BB40339DD82B12EF16
@muhlinux
/usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so is owned by librewolf-bin 130.0.1-1
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 147710952 Sep 22 19:06 /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so*
for me its fine.
libxul.so is corrupted in librewolf-bin 130.0.1-1
librewolf
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so:
/usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so: file too short
Couldn't load XPCOM.
size is 0 bytes
ls -l /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 0 Sep 23 13:14 /usr/lib/librewolf/libxul.so
Today was my third attempt at installing the current version (130) of LibreWolf to my up-to-date Manjaro KDE system. Two issues:
Has anyone here experienced the same issue?
EDIT 2024-09-15: Don’t bother, I installed the Flatpak version.
For quite some time now, the -bin
version of the package has not been based on the Arch specific (source) PKGBUILD
anymore, and thus does not include profiling anymore, for example, and probably some performance related build options.
So: It might be worth checking out the upstream repo(s) https://codeberg.org/librewolf/source and potentially open a PR (or an issue at https://codeberg.org/librewolf/issues/issues) regarding potential improvements on that front. Thanks!
@blutuna: Your results are even worse than mine: 30 % performance drop for LW compared to FF. Although they share the same source code. That is odd.
@karoyli... I get the following on my 5950, no tweaks to the installs... FF = 21.1 LW = 15.7 Floorp = 13.6 SRWare Iron = 20.6 Mullvad = 8.64
May be librewolf disable some runtime optimization for privacy reasons
Nice joke. But still, from my point of view librewolf should at least reach the same performance ratings as firefox.
Pinned Comments
lsf commented on 2021-11-10 12:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-04-17 07:18 (UTC) by lsf)
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Acquire_a_PGP_public_key_if_needed
gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 031F7104E932F7BD7416E7F6D2845E1305D6E801
/edit: starting with 112.0-1, the binaries are signed with the maintainers shared key, so
gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com --search-keys 662E3CDD6FE329002D0CA5BB40339DD82B12EF16
should do the trick instead. I've also signed the key with the previously used key, so you have at least some guarantee that it's not a malicious attack :)