I'm getting validation failure:-
Validating source files with sha512sums... Lidarr.develop.0.2.0.305.linux.tar.gz ... ?[0m ?[91mFAILED
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/lidarr-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | lidarr-bin |
Description: | Music collection manager for newsgroup and torrent users. |
Upstream URL: | https://lidarr.audio |
Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
Groups: | servarr-bin |
Conflicts: | lidarr |
Provides: | lidarr |
Submitter: | txtsd |
Maintainer: | txtsd (fryfrog) |
Last Packager: | txtsd |
Votes: | 14 |
Popularity: | 0.34 |
First Submitted: | 2024-10-15 14:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-17 09:07 (UTC) |
I'm getting validation failure:-
Validating source files with sha512sums... Lidarr.develop.0.2.0.305.linux.tar.gz ... ?[0m ?[91mFAILED
@fryfrog looks good to me mate, my automated scripts picked up your change and built a new docker image with no issues, so its all good for me.
@binhex and @orkeren, check out what I just pushed and see what you think. When Lidarr has regular (pre)releases, we can do away w/ the silliness. We'll still need to manually edit the pkgver, so don't forget to do that! :)
ok how about a bit of regex then so we don't rely on jq:-
lidarr_url=$(curl -s "https://services.lidarr.audio/v1/update/nightly/changes?os=linux" | grep -P -o -m 1 '(?<=url":")[^"]+' | head -1)
@binhex - that snippet though requires jq which we would have to add as dependency.
@fryfrog I'll add you. @binhex thanks for that snippet!
This might be of interest @fryfrog @orkeren, json output from appveyor, so you could curl this and then jq to get first entry, that way you can then just re-run without having to alter the url in the PKGBUILD:-
lidarr_url=$(curl "https://services.lidarr.audio/v1/update/nightly/changes?os=linux" | jq -r '.[0].url')
https://ci.appveyor.com/api/buildjobs/w3mqu9a4gtrdgv38/artifacts/Lidarr.develop.0.2.0.289.linux.tar.gz <- this one fixes mono 5.10.
I'd be happy to be a co-maintainer to help keep it more up to date.
@binhex there sadly is no way of targeting latest on appveyor. I am looking into creating an automated way though. Until then I will try to remember updating weekly.
@orkeren hey no probs, no apology required. How about a weekly build of this until things stabilise a bit, as those dev builds are obviously continuous, would that be a possibility? Not sure if there is a way of targeting 'latest' on appveyor to prevent the need to change the package?
Pinned Comments
txtsd commented on 2024-10-21 04:23 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-30 12:50 (UTC) by txtsd)
Alternate versions
lidarr (source version of this package)
lidarr-develop (develop branch)
lidarr-develop-bin (binary version of the develop branch)
lidarr-nightly-bin (nightly builds)