Package Details: neovim-git 0.10.0.r2536.g55c9e2c96e-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/neovim-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: neovim-git
Description: Fork of Vim aiming to improve user experience, plugins, and GUIs
Upstream URL: https://neovim.io
Keywords: editor
Licenses: custom:neovim
Conflicts: neovim
Provides: neovim, vim-plugin-runtime
Submitter: fhahn
Maintainer: Farzat
Last Packager: Farzat
Votes: 256
Popularity: 1.44
First Submitted: 2014-02-21 19:50 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-11 05:36 (UTC)

Dependencies (17)

Required by (432)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

fwalch commented on 2016-07-04 19:52 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-04 19:54 (UTC) by fwalch)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date just because the version number displayed on AUR seems old. This is normal for VCS packages. As long as building the package works without problems, it isn't necessary to update the PKGBUILD here. makepkg will automatically retrieve the latest version when you build the package locally.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 40 Next › Last »

dedguy21 commented on 2021-10-07 02:21 (UTC)

getting the follwing error when ":checkhealth:

health#check E684: list index out of range: 0

only happens with neovim-git, but not the neovim repo package.

Any clue what might be causing it, I'd like to continue using the git version.

groctel commented on 2021-07-03 08:05 (UTC)

Since 0.5.0 has be released and has added tree-sitter as a dependency I think it would be nice to add the new dependency and bump the pkgver :)

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2021-06-28 15:48 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-28 16:18 (UTC) by lmartinez-mirror)

Due to changes from both Neovim and Treesitter upstream, this package will not compile with tree-sitter alone. Not sure if anyone using tree-sitter-git can weigh in on this.

EDIT: Package builds with tree-sitter-git.

therisen06 commented on 2021-05-03 13:38 (UTC)

Could you please add -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR=lib to the cmake arguments? There is a lib64 vs lib conflict on Arch Linux derivatives (see https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CMake_package_guidelines).

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2021-04-11 05:54 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-25 00:20 (UTC) by lmartinez-mirror)

I noticed this package and neovim don't have any similar vimdoc.hook files for regenerating helptags. Are there any plans to add something like this to the packages, one that covers both /usr/share/vim/vimfiles/doc/ and /usr/share/nvim/runtime/doc/ maybe?

The last trace of discussion regarding this was a comment I dug up.

EDIT: I also think this package should provide neovim=0.5.0 seeing how that's what's actually reported by nvim --version.

fwalch commented on 2021-03-06 10:42 (UTC)

@lmartinez-mirror: Added, thanks!

lmartinez-mirror commented on 2021-02-17 21:59 (UTC)

Since neovim provides vim-plugin-runtime, wouldn't this package, as well? I see that the PKGBUILD also uses vim's plugin directory, so it would make sense to add it.

joshauc commented on 2021-02-12 07:53 (UTC)

This is great. Thanks for your work. Mine wasn't even a fix sorry for the spam.

fwalch commented on 2021-02-11 17:20 (UTC)

@joshauc: I took another look at this, and I think it can/should be fixed upstream. See #13844 and #13920.

joshauc commented on 2021-02-11 07:36 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-11 07:40 (UTC) by joshauc)

@fwalch Sorry for asking again, but would -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1"be added to the PKGFILE?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 .. 40 Next › Last »