Package Details: palemoon 1:33.4.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/palemoon.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: palemoon
Description: Open source web browser based on Firefox focusing on efficiency.
Upstream URL: https://www.palemoon.org/
Keywords: browser goanna web
Licenses: MPL-2.0
Submitter: artiom
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 141
Popularity: 0.131247
First Submitted: 2014-06-05 10:54 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-05 20:54 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

WorMzy commented on 2021-03-02 16:19 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-03 21:12 (UTC) by WorMzy)

The following key is used to sign release commits:

40481E7B8FCF9CEC

Import it into your keyring however you want.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/GnuPG#Import_a_public_key

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Next › Last »

aphirst commented on 2014-11-15 08:49 (UTC)

I tried to build this and it seemed to fail right at the end, after ~50m work. Initially I thought it was to do with doing it in tmpfs, so I did it again on my HDD with plenty of free space. Same problem. The tail end of the compilation process (my VTE only caches so much). http://pastebin.com/0dhKAr7e Is it possible that any of my makepkg.conf settings are interfering? The only change I made was adding `-march=native`.

WorMzy commented on 2014-11-14 11:12 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, looks like git_refnames has been bumped again. As before, I have updated the md5sums, but not bumped the pkgrel. There's no need for people to rebuild because of the change. I may change the PKGBUILD to pull the tags from git for the next release, since the tarballs are apparently dynamic.

dicktater commented on 2014-11-14 04:55 (UTC)

Please update the PKGBUILD once you find out what's changed again with the github tarball. Thanks! 2014-11-13 palemoon 25.1.0-1 Validating source files with md5sums... 25.1.0_Release.tar.gz ... FAILED palemoon.desktop ... Passed mozconfig.in ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build palemoon.

WorMzy commented on 2014-10-20 13:46 (UTC)

Looks like there was only a minor change: diff -aur old/Pale-Moon-25.0.1_Release/addon-sdk/source/python-lib/cuddlefish/_version.py new/Pale-Moon-25.0.1_Release/addon-sdk/source/python-lib/cuddlefish/_version.py --- old/Pale-Moon-25.0.1_Release/addon-sdk/source/python-lib/cuddlefish/_version.py 2014-10-13 23:51:35.000000000 +0100 +++ new/Pale-Moon-25.0.1_Release/addon-sdk/source/python-lib/cuddlefish/_version.py 2014-10-13 23:51:35.000000000 +0100 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ # (https://github.com/warner/python-versioneer) # these strings will be replaced by git during git-archive -git_refnames = " (tag: 25.0.1_Release, 25.0_RelBranch)" +git_refnames = " (tag: 25.0.1_Release)" git_full = "d981952fd1255581206e33e503afb378704da62d" I'll update the PKGBUILD, but I won't increment the pkgrel.

WorMzy commented on 2014-10-20 13:39 (UTC)

@hund: No worries, it happens. As it happens, it was quite lucky that you clicked it, as I hadn't subscribed to the comments, so I'd have missed erikwesselius' message otherwise. @erikwesselius: Looks like the github tarball changed for some reason. I'll update the PKGBUILD once I find out what's changed.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-10-20 11:18 (UTC)

I'm sawwy! I missed the "Vote for this package" link and pressed the "Flag this package as out of date" link instead. :( PS. Brilliant idea to have them so close together. DS.

zilvervos commented on 2014-10-20 07:33 (UTC)

Read an article about palemoon in the German Linux User magazin and wanted to try it out. But when trying to build from AUR I get this error: Validating source files with md5sums... 25.0.1_Release.tar.gz ... FAILED palemoon.desktop ... Passed mozconfig.in ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build palemoon. ==> Restart building palemoon ? [y/N] Trying again (which means that the 25.0.1_Release.tar.gz is downloaded again by the installer) didn't help. Same md5sum problem.

archuser474747 commented on 2014-09-12 06:20 (UTC)

No problems with HW acceleration here on my GTX570. Using 24.7.1 to 24.7.2.

magikfingerz commented on 2014-09-11 16:02 (UTC)

Compile and installation of version 24.7.2 went fine, all looks working stable, thanks! :)