Package Details: rust-src-git 4:1.82.0.r1.59a74db3-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rust-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rust-git
Description: Source code for the Rust standard library
Upstream URL: https://www.rust-lang.org/
Keywords: cargo rust
Licenses: Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Conflicts: rust-src
Provides: rust-src
Submitter: mrshpot
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: None
Votes: 28
Popularity: 0.094429
First Submitted: 2012-01-21 11:30 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-08-23 12:50 (UTC)

Required by (21)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

gsnedders commented on 2014-06-10 13:29 (UTC)

Bah, I must be blind! I had a quick look at options and managed to glaze over the "!" and got slightly confused but moved on. But yes — parallel builds appear to work now.

heinrich5991 commented on 2014-06-09 22:47 (UTC)

Maybe you could make a blacklist isntead of a whitelist. Also note that it currently misses all files directly in the doc directory (not the subfolders).

spider-mario commented on 2014-06-09 21:58 (UTC)

The goal was to avoid copying useless .aux, .log and .out files, but indeed, missing useful files is worse.

heinrich5991 commented on 2014-06-09 20:36 (UTC)

The docs are not properly copied, it misses the JS files at least. Why does it make a selection based on file extension?

spider-mario commented on 2014-06-03 16:41 (UTC)

It’s ignored because of '!makeflags' in the `options` array. I think that I added that option because parallel builds didn’t seem to work. If they work now, I’ll happily remove it. :)

gsnedders commented on 2014-06-03 16:35 (UTC)

MAKEFLAGS seems to be ignored, though I can't immediately see why. Having to do non-parallel builds makes it a lot slower. :(

spider-mario commented on 2014-04-05 07:48 (UTC)

I think I’ll just make the package provide `rust` now. Its version format sufficiently resembles that of `rust` in [community] now that makepkg natively supports VCS packages and let them have a pkgver() function.

spider-mario commented on 2014-04-04 20:15 (UTC)

Actually, the out-of-date notification comes from someone else (H3g3m0n), and it’s justified since 0.10 is out, which means that the `provides` field of this package should be updated. (I’m working on it.) Thanks for explaining the point of VCS packages to Apes, though.

thestinger commented on 2014-04-04 19:50 (UTC)

Also, please only use out-of-date flags when something needs to be updated to a new release. It shouldn't be used whenever there is a problem with the package.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »