Package Details: davinci-resolve 19.1.3-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: LicenseRef-Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: Muflone
Last Packager: Muflone
Votes: 149
Popularity: 4.97
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-01-26 02:20 (UTC)

Dependencies (25)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

Muflone commented on 2025-01-26 00:55 (UTC)

IMPORTANT!

Since version 19.1.3-2 this package will not download automatically the source file from the upstream site.

To build this package you will need to manually download the file from https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion and place it in the same directory with the PKGBUILD.

This would reduce the mess in this package, making it more readable and clear. Also bypassing the required information from the upstream URL is not allowed in an automated way.

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:14 (UTC)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .. 59 Next › Last »

fmeow commented on 2019-10-24 02:11 (UTC)

Source file for DaVinci_Resolve_16.1_Linux.zip is expired.

satriani commented on 2019-10-21 09:52 (UTC)

With this new version, you no longer need to download the ZIP file from the Blackmagic Design website. The script does it automatically.

DJ9 commented on 2019-10-18 00:59 (UTC)

The latest free version I grabbed is DaVinci_Resolve_16.1_Linux.zip which won't install for some reason. The file was in my downloads directory, which failed to find the file, and I also copied it the the /var/pamac-build-DJ9/davinci-resolve directory, and nothing. It was insisting on 16.0. ?

c3n21 commented on 2019-09-22 20:52 (UTC)

I actually get this error:

/opt/resolve/bin/resolve: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.10.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I've already installed cuda-10.1.243-1 package and exported LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/cuda/lib64 but it's no use

Juicebox commented on 2019-08-28 16:42 (UTC)

@pegasusearl You need to download Davinci Resolve from their website and place it in your Downloads directory or in your pamac build directory. It says it right above the "==>Making package" line.

pegasusearl commented on 2019-08-27 04:32 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-27 05:49 (UTC) by pegasusearl)

Using Pamac I got this output:

==> Making package: davinci-resolve 16.0-2 (Tue 27 Aug 2019 11:25:56 AM WIB)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
==> ERROR: DaVinci_Resolve_16.0_Linux.zip was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.

ChristophWurst commented on 2019-08-25 15:10 (UTC)

This currently gives me

failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies: davinci-resolve)

on update or installation. The PKGBUILD should list "davinci-resolve-beta" as conflict and not "davinci-resolve" itself.

Building the package manually (without pacaur in this case) worked fine, though.

nixit commented on 2019-08-16 20:39 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-16 20:40 (UTC) by nixit)

Just installed the latest davinci-resolve 16.0-2. I noticed line 25 in the pkgbuild still references the beta version:

"if [ ${pkgname} == "davinci-resolve-studio-beta" ]; then"

Not sure if this was missed.

funnyprun commented on 2019-08-15 16:52 (UTC)

Hello, this package is working very good aside from an issue where I am unable to input Japanse characters in the textboxes. I'm using fcitx-mozc and fcitx-diagnose tool reports no problems with qt5 nor gtk2. So, I'm a bit confused as to what is causing this problem. I would appreciate any help!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .. 59 Next › Last »