Package Details: davinci-resolve 19.0.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davinci-resolve.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: davinci-resolve
Description: Professional A/V post-production software suite from Blackmagic Design
Upstream URL: https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/support/family/davinci-resolve-and-fusion
Keywords: blackmagic davinci editor resolve video
Licenses: Commercial
Conflicts: davinci-resolve-beta, davinci-resolve-studio, davinci-resolve-studio-beta
Submitter: jonathon
Maintainer: satriani
Last Packager: satriani
Votes: 141
Popularity: 3.05
First Submitted: 2017-04-19 20:57 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-22 20:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (24)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

satriani commented on 2021-05-15 14:15 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-15 14:16 (UTC) by satriani)

Issues and bugs, please report on the official forum here: https://forum.blackmagicdesign.com/viewforum.php?f=21&sid=239f0d5c49abe5d6a635b69638192e9a Thank you!

Visit DaVinci Resolve - ArchWiki before installing: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DaVinci_Resolve

ATTENTION: Please don't flag this package as out-of-date before beta version has been released as stable!

This is a current stable Package!

The current free beta is available here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-beta/

And for current studio beta here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/davinci-resolve-studio-beta/

Thanks.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 .. 54 Next › Last »

satriani commented on 2019-03-26 20:07 (UTC)

@alex.forencich: Fixed, thank you!

alex.forencich commented on 2019-03-20 21:28 (UTC)

The package has an extra softlink in it, which is only valid if you have a user 'alex' on your system. That one had me going for a while as it was almost correct on my machine and I definitely didn't make it myself.

satriani commented on 2019-03-10 10:35 (UTC)

Actually, there was a typo. Fixed. Thank you!

Tim54000 commented on 2019-03-09 18:06 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have expressed myself better. I am talking about this condition but you use the lognam command (which does not exist) instead of logname. I'm new to Linux and at the moment I don't have the knowledge to tell you if the condition is useful or not but enough to make sure you made a typo. Nice day for you!

satriani commented on 2019-03-09 15:56 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-09 15:58 (UTC) by satriani)

I thank you for your feedback and ask for a suggestion. Then I could write the condition like this:

if [ ! "$(lognam 2>&1 >/dev/null)" ]; then
    _user=$(logname)
    _group=$(id -g -n ${_user})
fi

Tim54000 commented on 2019-03-09 14:25 (UTC) (edited on 2019-03-09 14:26 (UTC) by Tim54000)

The condition to use logname is always wrong because it is poorly written (introduced in #e55cae9d).

bartus commented on 2019-03-05 14:20 (UTC)

There is a problem with chroot build introduced in #7cf524bc commit. Basically, you can't use logname as there is no user present (null output, warning on stderr: logname: no login name). If you need to change file permissions, please do it in postinstall script.

Ashark commented on 2019-02-10 18:33 (UTC)

@Harpy1991 opencl-driver is already in the dependencies list.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 .. 54 Next › Last »