Package Details: firefox-beta-bin 127.0b5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-beta-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-beta-bin
Description: Standalone web browser from mozilla.org - Beta
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/channel/#beta
Keywords: gecko
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox-beta
Provides: firefox
Submitter: Schnouki
Maintainer: symen (bittin)
Last Packager: bittin
Votes: 399
Popularity: 0.020492
First Submitted: 2010-07-07 09:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-22 17:22 (UTC)

Dependencies (13)

Required by (156)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Next › Last »

yetAnotherZero commented on 2010-10-12 16:03 (UTC)

let me know when it drops. releases are still at b6 :-)

cookiecaper commented on 2010-10-12 06:11 (UTC)

Out of date? The nightlies are now Firefox 4.0b8pre, implying that 4.0b7 should be released or releasing shortly.

yetAnotherZero commented on 2010-09-23 17:54 (UTC)

Just so you know: I use makepkg to pull the sources. I just hard code the 686 arch in to get that file to come down. It sounds like it's isolated to your machine somehow.

Rulatir commented on 2010-09-23 00:51 (UTC)

I'm on i686. Tried with raw makepkg w/o wrappers (used aurget before). The problem persists. The file being downloaded is: firefox-4.0b6.tar.bz2 Size: 13705216 MD5: 83f53c99a457cbc8c92648b73fbc42bc SHA1: e1b62c6251a01fd05e304ff52c00ecee5085757b When downloaded with a web browser, the size is 13704023, and this is the good file. Binary diff viewer indicates that the bad file is exactly the good file zero-padded to the next multiple of 4k. Must be a bug in whatever makepkg uses to retrieve the file, or in btrfs (falloc???).

Rulatir commented on 2010-09-23 00:09 (UTC)

@speed145a: while it is possible that a download was bad, it is very unlikely that a download, a re-download, a re-re-download and a re-re-re-download were ALL bad. This file is downloaded from a single location, so it was NOT just bad luck with mirrors. Attempting again now.

yetAnotherZero commented on 2010-09-21 19:18 (UTC)

I rechecked the checksums and they seem fine on both arches...

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Next › Last »