Package Details: mutter-performance-devkit 49.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: GNOME Mutter Development Kit
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: glorious-yellow
Last Packager: glorious-yellow
Votes: 74
Popularity: 0.000005
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-09-26 01:43 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.

The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 .. 65 Next › Last »

glorious-yellow commented on 2019-07-25 22:15 (UTC)

New commit hashes for 189 are 9499bc21 and ce0e5db7

ameeno commented on 2019-07-18 10:52 (UTC)

I had to replace

# Title: Geometric (OpenGL-less) picking # URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/189 # Type: 1 # Status: 2 # Comment: git cherry-pick -n 76462a2f

to git cherry-pick -n 73fe41a5

for this to build.

Saren commented on 2019-07-12 05:51 (UTC)

@Terence I see, just learned about it!

Terence commented on 2019-07-09 14:18 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-09 14:22 (UTC) by Terence)

@Saren on package actions on the right you can use the submit request and choose merge. Then, the Trusted Users get notified and it's submitted on the AUR mailing list. They have just one button to click on the web interface I guess.

chrisjbillington commented on 2019-07-09 13:12 (UTC)

@alex4401 I see the same problem. I commented out the various cherry-picks a few at a time and determined that !575 seems to be the issue. Reported upstream here:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/575#note_550478

Saren commented on 2019-07-09 13:04 (UTC)

Great. How did it work?

alex4401 commented on 2019-07-09 11:42 (UTC)

Minimized windows (by window control buttons) are now returning to their normal state improperly. For me, they visually open mostly in the second half of the screen (or with 3/4 of the window below Dash to Panel taskbar) but technically they're are back at their original position as I am able to interact with the affected windows by clicking where anywhere where they should be. Alt+tabing to another application and alt+tabbing back to the affected application restores it to the correct state.

Also, Coverflow alt-tab extension (most notably, Timeline setting) is not compatible with the latest updates - while the main functionality works as expected, the wallpaper isn't redrawn when going through the window list (and the remains of windows scrolled by appear until the alt-tab is finished).

alex4401 commented on 2019-07-09 11:34 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-09 11:42 (UTC) by alex4401)

fatal: bad revision '3ca3194f^..1be20af0' - MR600 has had its range changed to b60aa2c4^..4b639866

Saren commented on 2019-07-09 09:55 (UTC)

@Terence I am okay with the package rename. Can we get an AUR admin to help us with this matter?

Also in the PKGBUILD of mutter-performance I think it's good to use add mutter-781835-workaround to provides and conflicts, or replaces.

Terence commented on 2019-07-09 09:45 (UTC)

@alex4401 Glad it works now :)

@deezid That's weird, maybe try to provide more info and/or find what MR produces it.

@chrisjbillington Your issue was reported and is being tracked here: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/493#note_549833

@Saren I've created https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mutter-performance and I am also writing a forum post where all the discussions unrelated to packaging will go. Can I have your review of the package and approval? I'll then proceed to ask to move this one to the other.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 .. 65 Next › Last »