@Saren I would like to know if you still need the revert.patch.
Search Criteria
Package Details: mutter-performance-devkit 49.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | mutter-performance |
| Description: | GNOME Mutter Development Kit |
| Upstream URL: | https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter |
| Licenses: | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | Terence |
| Maintainer: | glorious-yellow |
| Last Packager: | glorious-yellow |
| Votes: | 74 |
| Popularity: | 0.000005 |
| First Submitted: | 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-09-26 01:43 (UTC) |
Dependencies (18)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
- glib2 (glib2-gitAUR, glib2-patched-thumbnailerAUR)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-eacAUR, glibc-git-native-pgoAUR)
- gtk4 (gtk4-paper-planeAUR, gtk4-gitAUR, gtk4-develAUR)
- hicolor-icon-theme (hicolor-icon-theme-gitAUR)
- libadwaita (libadwaita-gitAUR, libadwaita-yaru-gitAUR, libadwaita-without-adwaita-gitAUR, libadwaita-without-adwaitaAUR)
- libei (libei-gitAUR, libei-basu-gitAUR)
- libpipewire (libpipewire-gitAUR, libpipewire-full-gitAUR, libpipewire-ldacAUR)
- mutter (mutter-beta-performanceAUR, mutter-performance-unstableAUR, mutter-touchpad-scroll-patchAUR, mutter-mobileAUR, mutter-performanceAUR, mutter-gitAUR)
- bash-completion (bash-completion-gitAUR) (make)
- gi-docgen (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- glib2-devel (glib2-devel-gitAUR) (make)
- gobject-introspection (make)
- meson (meson-gitAUR) (make)
- python-docutils (make)
- sysprof (sysprof-gitAUR) (make)
- wayland-protocols (wayland-protocols-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (2)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. 65 Next › Last »
Terence commented on 2019-05-07 15:08 (UTC)
kode54 commented on 2019-05-07 03:30 (UTC)
I didn't need a clean chroot, I just needed to remove and re-clone the entire source directory.
Terence commented on 2019-05-06 06:51 (UTC)
@kode54 I asked someone else to build it and he also doesn't have this issue. Maybe try to build it in a clean chroot.
kode54 commented on 2019-05-06 06:42 (UTC)
I guess this counts for the one project I can't rely on to build correctly if I don't rm -rf and re-clone it with every release.
Terence commented on 2019-05-06 05:45 (UTC)
@kode54 I don't get that with a fresh git clone and using makepkg.
kode54 commented on 2019-05-06 05:32 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-06 05:34 (UTC) by kode54)
I get this output on a fresh run in an old directory:
And this diff from Git afterward:
Terence commented on 2019-05-06 04:58 (UTC)
@kode54 Can you show me where it is and what it should be please?
kode54 commented on 2019-05-06 04:44 (UTC)
You keep updating this package with one digit lopped off the revision hash, so makepkg regenerates the version, and resets the revision number to 1.
Terence commented on 2019-05-04 20:31 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-04 20:31 (UTC) by Terence)
@glorious-yellow if you are on Xorg, this patch can't have any impact, but please report any findings ;).
glorious-yellow commented on 2019-05-04 20:10 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-04 20:11 (UTC) by glorious-yellow)
460 causes framedrops for me too, especially when many windows are open.
Edit: It may not be 460, but something has been causing framedrops for me recently. I will investigate further.
Pinned Comments
Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)
If you are getting errors like
fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32'while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.Please notify me in comment section if this happens.
The optional performance patches are by default enabled.
A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/