Package Details: mutter-performance 48.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: Window manager and compositor for GNOME
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-16.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: glorious-yellow
Last Packager: glorious-yellow
Votes: 76
Popularity: 0.014062
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-14 05:13 (UTC)

Dependencies (68)

Required by (16)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-05-02 11:11 (UTC)

gnome-44 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/aaf26db49292840aef43210001b4e080

For people using [staging] & [gnome-unstable] branch (or [testing] branch in the near future).

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-02-13 04:41 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the co-maintainer of the package.

Unfortunately, my laptop's gpu died a few days ago. So I cannot bring lots of changes to the package. The only thing I can do right now is upgrading the package along with mr1441 only.

Sorry for the situation and I hope you understand it. If you want to be a co-maintainer of this package, please contact fiestalake@disroot.org and/or the other maintainers. Thanks.

<deleted-account> commented on 2022-10-27 15:54 (UTC)

gnome-43 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/d6d9e597fe693b3f55d92890880e463c

For people using [testing] branch.

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.


The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 .. 65 Next › Last »

Terence commented on 2019-08-03 16:31 (UTC)

Thanks @gedgon, really appreciate it, added!

gedgon commented on 2019-08-03 10:07 (UTC)

Another performance related MR from Mr. Daniel van Vugt for testing:

  # Title: clutter/stage-cogl: Factor in pending_swaps to next_presentation_time
  # URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/651
  # Type: 1
  # Status: 2
  # Comment:
   git cherry-pick -n 5e950092

chrisjbillington commented on 2019-08-02 18:32 (UTC)

The issue reported by @truongan here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/#comment-702729

is resolved for me by commenting out !711.

Terence commented on 2019-08-02 16:06 (UTC)

@glorious-yellow I already added it 4 hours ago ;)

glorious-yellow commented on 2019-08-02 16:04 (UTC)

A new MR has appeared: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/711

Terence commented on 2019-08-02 12:21 (UTC)

@gedgon Thank you very much for the report and the fix, updated.

deezid commented on 2019-08-01 23:35 (UTC)

@gedgon same here using NVIDIA and Chrome. Looks like the animation in the Solitaire application on Windows 95 lol

gedgon commented on 2019-08-01 23:12 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-02 10:37 (UTC) by gedgon)

Looks like the updated !698 (2812338b^..f501fdcc) clipping doesn't play nice with Chromium windows, at least on Polaris. Can someone confirm? https://youtu.be/TqomPMf9IpQ

Edit: !707 fixes the above

#Title: window-actor: Fix rectangle coordinates in culling
#URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/707
#Type: 3
#Status: 4
#Comment: Fix for !698
git cherry-pick -n aae9f3a3

alex4401 commented on 2019-07-31 19:26 (UTC)

New commit hashes for MR698

Terence commented on 2019-07-28 13:19 (UTC) (edited on 2019-07-28 14:23 (UTC) by Terence)

@kode54: Ok, just keep me updated if you find any bugs later ;)

@glorious-yellow: Wayland? Ok I'll test it and if all seems good I'll push it.