Package Details: mutter-performance 48.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: Window manager and compositor for GNOME
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-16.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: glorious-yellow
Last Packager: glorious-yellow
Votes: 76
Popularity: 0.013505
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-04-14 05:13 (UTC)

Dependencies (68)

Required by (16)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-05-02 11:11 (UTC)

gnome-44 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/aaf26db49292840aef43210001b4e080

For people using [staging] & [gnome-unstable] branch (or [testing] branch in the near future).

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

<deleted-account> commented on 2023-02-13 04:41 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the co-maintainer of the package.

Unfortunately, my laptop's gpu died a few days ago. So I cannot bring lots of changes to the package. The only thing I can do right now is upgrading the package along with mr1441 only.

Sorry for the situation and I hope you understand it. If you want to be a co-maintainer of this package, please contact fiestalake@disroot.org and/or the other maintainers. Thanks.

<deleted-account> commented on 2022-10-27 15:54 (UTC)

gnome-43 diffs: https://gist.github.com/FiestaLake/d6d9e597fe693b3f55d92890880e463c

For people using [testing] branch.

Apply the patch with git am {patchname}.patch

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.


The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 65 Next › Last »

deezid commented on 2019-01-31 10:00 (UTC) (edited on 2019-01-31 10:01 (UTC) by deezid)

@Terence is revert.patch applied atm in latest PKGBUILD? Don't have any programming skills, sorry.

@calindan2013 what does slow mean? Dragging windows, scrolling in windows, or just the workplace switcher on the right while zooming in? Also more 30Hz slow (like stock 3.30 mutter) or "only" 60Hz (like the max on my 4K 27" anyway)

calindan2013 commented on 2019-01-31 09:57 (UTC)

still slow

deezid commented on 2019-01-31 09:55 (UTC)

@Terence, after applying the 3.30 117 patch, everything stays smooth without 168 applied. So problem is solved I guess? :)

Terence commented on 2019-01-31 09:52 (UTC)

@deezid do you feel the difference without the revert patch applied?

Terence commented on 2019-01-31 09:51 (UTC)

@DeadMetaler thanks, updated. @deezid Do you have a 1000Hz mouse? Also, try to drag the window around while playing a video with and without 168 and tell me how it feels, thanks.

deezid commented on 2019-01-31 09:46 (UTC)

@DeadMetaler, haha, just had the same idea!

deezid commented on 2019-01-31 09:45 (UTC)

Seems like with 168 applied in my "smoothness test" (playing YouTube in 4K in one windows, scrolling in another), everything stays smoother. Without 168 it becomes quite messy after a few seconds.

Another question, wondering if 117 applies at all? There are lots of messages before compiling about not being able to apply it? Why not use the 3.30 branch version of the patch instead? 9a466f28

DeadMetaler commented on 2019-01-31 09:42 (UTC)

error: could not apply 8655bc5d8... clutter: Fix offscreen-effect painting of clones

Use this 3.30 based branch https://gitlab.gnome.org/vanvugt/mutter/commits/fix-offscreen-clones-3.30

Terence commented on 2019-01-31 08:32 (UTC)

@deezid how does this new version compare to the previous ones?

Terence commented on 2019-01-31 07:59 (UTC)

I disabled 168 again because even with the patch supposed to fix it, moving windows around with 500Hz/1000hz mouse is horrible.