Arch Linux User Repository

@juancarlospaco this is easily done on your own system, not in a PKGBUILD, given that building packages runs as root:

sudo groupadd unrealengine-users
sudo usermod -aG unrealengine-users (your-username)
sudo chown -R root:unrealengine-users /opt/unreal-engine
sudo chmod -R 775 /opt/unreal-engine

Permission issues like this are already mentioned on the UE Arch wiki page: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Unreal_Engine_4#Installing_from_the_AUR

This is a user system problem; I already did what I could without needing users to do the above by giving the 777 permissions. If it still gives you trouble, you'll have to use the example to solve it or change the install location to somewhere you have user permissions by default (as I cannot do this for you).

Will update to 5.0 when it is released.

@zerophase, I compiled developer preview 2 successfully, just changed the branch name in the current latest PKGBUILD.

Trying to compile Unreal 5. I keep getting this error. Does anyone know how to fix?

https://pastebin.com/YKPM3gFT

Does UAT fully support C++ projects? That's all I really worry about.

Sure! Projects compilation is also noticeably faster.

We should be using BuildConfiguration.xml, as UBT does not necessarily respect MAKEFLAGS. Their build system definitely manually changes some of those values, like passing make more jobs I'd love to have it setup to support large core count cpus, as I use them personally. I just don't think the average user has 24+ cores.

Sorry, maybe I didn't get it something... MAKEFLAGS work both when building the engine and when compiling C++ projects. I tested it myself. Why hardcode the number of cores?

Users that want custom build configurations can just modify the file before compiling with makepkg, and use something like Paru to make their changes permanent for updates.

I only turn features on by default if they're accepted upstream.

Of course! But I disabled the system mono patch by default because this requires user intervention after. But feel free to enable it if you think otherwise. Has the ccache_executor.patch patch been accepted in 5.0 / 4.27? I missed it.

@shatur Does UAT fully support C++ projects? That's all I really worry about. It might complicate any modifications on our part to better support Arch Linux.

I just put a thread limit in there as I didn't know how all cpus scale with that multiplier.

We should be using BuildConfiguration.xml, as UBT does not necessarily respect MAKEFLAGS. Their build system definitely manually changes some of those values, like passing make more jobs. Sticking to how UBT works should make maintence easier.

Users that want custom build configurations can just modify the file before compiling with makepkg, and use something like Paru to make their changes permanent for updates.

I'd love to have it setup to support large core count cpus, as I use them personally. I just don't think the average user has 24+ cores.

I only turn features on by default if they're accepted upstream.

@zerophase, I don't think this is a good idea. UAT is the preferred way for binary deployment. It also doesn't require any additional dependencies. According to my observations, it not only builds the project and removes all unnecessary junk, it also creates a special file that forces UBT not to check the changes in the engine. It just my observation, maybe it does something else! Doing all this stuff manually simply not worth it. And it will be hard to maintain.

Also I do not think that hardcoding the number of threads by default is a good idea :) You can simply use MAKEFLAGS as I do. I bet the users want to have an unmodified version of the engine. Check out our conversation @OdinVex.

--march=native is good for building the engine itself, but building projects using this flag is bad because they will be tied to the CPU it was built on.

I would go back to using make for building, and just run all of the UAT stuff manually. All you're doing is abstracting package maintenance into the automation system, which requires dependencies to use. I guess just diff the directory differences, and just remove the unneeded files during the package step.

There's a 30 thread limit put in to cap how high the multiplier scales for systems with less cores, while maintaining responsiveness. If you need more than thirty cores, build manually with makepkg, or let paru manage your local PKGBUILD with git. That multiplier is there to speed up compilation, as much as possible, without negatively impacting the responsiveness of said system. It's not our responsibility to maintain the PKGBUILD for your specific system.

-march=native is fine for compiling for most newer cpus, and should only be turned on if you're willing to test it. Works perfectly fine for Haswell and Broadwell cpus. Plus you need to pass a command line argument to enable it. I turned on looking for bugs with other cpus, as it got accepted upstream. Maintaining and patching the Unreal Build System is the solution, not MAKEFLAGS. UBT manages each subproject, and won't necessarily play nice with variables from outside.

@Shatur, It is almost always a plugin, such as under Marketplace. We have to make everything, so we'll usually j# once, maybe twice, then j1. I just wish UE could spend a day going through themselves to allow j# and simply fix compile-order for j1-required pieces and allow plugin developers to specify an override for j just in case. It'd alleviate about 5 minutes of work each, for ours. (The waiting and going back and forth. My compiles usually take about 4-6 minutes, but I've got some decent hardware.)

@OdinVex :D No issues. Yes, we now have a stock build with some options disabled by default. The engine is now properly packaged for distribution and takes much less space.

I've always had to customize the pkgbuild to undo that bit but I don't mind too much.

This is weird... Could you try the latest version? I also had problems when I called make -j8. But if I call a specific target, for example make -j8 UnrealEditor, then everything works correctly. But in the new method, make itself is not called directly. If you still need to control this, then use the variable MAKEFLAGS.

@Shatur, I may need to eat foot here, I could have sworn those were being added. The business with BuildConfiguration.xml modifications and such. prepares knife and fork for foot And no, j# will not always work. Sometimes things change (plugins for example) and they break with j# and need j1. Stock is make, not specific make. I've always had to customize the pkgbuild to undo that bit but I don't mind too much.

I'll just create a repo for stock-build for my own team and just use that.

But we use stock-build too...

We use make because we use all of UE.

If you need to change the engine itself - yes, this is a good idea. BTW, if you want to build with -j# - simply build every target separately - it will work corerctly.

I really don't understand you :)