Package Details: chromium-dev 126.0.6423.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/chromium-dev.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: chromium-dev
Description: The open-source project behind Google Chrome (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL: http://www.chromium.org
Keywords: browser web
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: None
Maintainer: sl1pkn07
Last Packager: sl1pkn07
Votes: 158
Popularity: 0.004920
First Submitted: 2010-05-17 09:04 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-21 19:18 (UTC)

Dependencies (84)

Required by (0)

Sources (13)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 .. 152 Next › Last »

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-06-02 06:19 (UTC)

More log please

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-06-02 05:10 (UTC)

i keep on getting this error trying to build the new update. ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-05-13 18:53 (UTC)

no. you need rebuild chromium-dev symlink missing libraries is mala praxis

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-05-13 18:48 (UTC)

If you find an error saying /usr/lib/chromium-dev/chromium-dev: error while loading shared libraries: libwebp.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory you can fix it like this sudo ln -s /usr/lib64/libwebp.so.7 /usr/lib64/libwebp.so.6

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-05-12 03:59 (UTC)

Nice job on the very quick update :)

axfelix commented on 2017-05-08 17:37 (UTC)

Does this build not contain the new support for native notifications on Linux? Is that somehow only in Chrome rather than Chromium?

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-05-03 13:57 (UTC)

@M4P9be3w0u done

M4P9be3w0u commented on 2017-05-02 22:52 (UTC)

I had to modify to the file "vaapi_patch_r0.patch" to compile version 60.0.3080.5-1 with vaapi enabled. Find the patch file that worked for me here: https://pastebin.com/qMH50eKS . (Disclaimer: not sure if this is the right place to poste this. May not work for eveyone.)

LordAro commented on 2017-04-18 09:56 (UTC)

oh indeed, that's how i built the package in the end. the question is whether the PKGBUILD *should* be able to handle being called in separate steps. Should probably take this to a mailing list...

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-04-17 16:53 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-17 16:57 (UTC) by sl1pkn07)

try with plain makepkg ;) (without options)