Package Details: emacs-git 30.0.50.169253-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/emacs-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: emacs-git
Description: GNU Emacs. Development master branch.
Upstream URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
Keywords: development editor IDE text
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: emacs
Provides: emacs
Submitter: toropisco
Maintainer: toropisco
Last Packager: toropisco
Votes: 107
Popularity: 1.93
First Submitted: 2014-01-05 02:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-10-14 18:36 (UTC)

Required by (313)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

toropisco commented on 2017-06-30 19:14 (UTC) (edited on 2022-05-15 13:26 (UTC) by toropisco)

This PKGBUILD is a work in progress. If you find PACKAGING bugs, please let me know ASAP.

Upstream bugs are to be reported upstream. Check out the emacs-devel archives to confirm if this is an already known bug. In fact... Why are you not subscribed to emacs-devel?. Also check the emacs-bug-tracker archives.

Reporting bugs: Write to the Emacs Bug Tracker and report it there. Or, better yet, use the debbugs client included with the text editor. You will find instructions at https://debbugs.gnu.org/. Good luck!

If you confirm it is a packaging bug, you are welcome to report it here.

Yaourt and other automated tools users BEWARE! This PKGBUILD is written with hand updating in mind and I won't fix bugs arising from such use. Besides, cloning the same repository time and time again from a non-profit such as the GNU Project/FSF gives out a very low image of you.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Next › Last »

nsantos commented on 2012-04-27 16:05 (UTC)

@bintang Ah! I believe you've hit the problem on its head. :P Nope, I don't follow [testing]; at least, not since I broke my main machine with it, with an important deadline looming. :P

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-04-27 08:11 (UTC)

rev 108055 + gtk3 still fail :( @nsantos, do you use testing repo?

nsantos commented on 2012-04-24 14:13 (UTC)

@bintang, @myuhe I was able to build a package without problems. I'm at revision 108018, and am linking against GTK+3.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-04-24 09:23 (UTC)

Yup I can confirm myuhe error and I'm glad that i'm not alone. ~_~

nsantos commented on 2012-04-22 13:34 (UTC)

@myuhe Which version of GTK+ are you building against? (If you didn't edit the PKGBUILD, you built against version 2.x) I'd like to try and reproduce the error. (Also, sometimes, there are build errors that result from erroneous assumptions in the build environment in a particular revision. Either that, or it's just your garden-variety developer-induced bug. I've ran into a number of them while following -bzr; they usually go away after a few days or so (one time, an error got fixed by the very next commit). That's the price we pay for living on the edge. :D)

myuhe commented on 2012-04-22 10:19 (UTC)

I get the follow error. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=140037 I couldn't solve it. anyone can solve it?

nsantos commented on 2012-02-09 19:59 (UTC)

Oh, hey, mrz beat me to it. :P

nsantos commented on 2012-02-09 19:59 (UTC)

@smoge return removed. As for the usage of chmod: its targets are all paths installed by Emacs' Makefile; they only need their permissions tweaked a bit. I've never used install for this purpose; is this a valid use case for it? @galdor Unless autoconf and automake have been moved out of the base-devel group, then, no, makedepends shouldn't include them. (This from https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#makedepends)

mrz commented on 2012-02-09 11:17 (UTC)

From the page "Base package groups" in the wiki:"The group "base-devel" is assumed to be installed when building with makepkg.". So autoconf and automake aren't needed in makedepends.

galdor commented on 2012-01-22 19:20 (UTC)

makedepends should include autoconf and automake.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Next › Last »