Package Details: lightworks 2025.1.149933-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/lightworks.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lightworks
Description: Lightworks is a professional video editing suite
Upstream URL: http://www.lwks.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: lwks-beta
Replaces: lwks
Submitter: marcinn
Maintainer: fishmonger
Last Packager: fishmonger
Votes: 137
Popularity: 0.118581
First Submitted: 2020-06-09 21:21 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-02-17 17:32 (UTC)

Dependencies (20)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 18 Next › Last »

PieterDeBruijn commented on 2014-09-30 13:01 (UTC)

Updated to 12.0. If anyone has suggestions, please let me know!

stjhimy commented on 2014-09-30 12:34 (UTC)

Guys, sorry the delay, I'm having to travel a lot because of my work. I will disown the package right now, hope you guys can take a better care of it. Thanks.

scriptwarlock commented on 2014-09-26 04:23 (UTC)

any plans for an update? stable release is 12.0

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-08-30 17:27 (UTC)

"The way he proposed the PKGBUILD didn't look nice because he was proposing to replace someelse's work with no further explanation, disvaluing CYB3R's effort." Sorry also for that, I thought that looking at the PKGBUILD would be enough to see the changes and didn't bother in actually writing them down. I will remember to actually do that whenever I propose a PKGBUILD change/replacement again.

orschiro commented on 2014-08-30 11:30 (UTC)

> "The way he proposed the PKGBUILD didn't look nice because he was proposing to replace someelse's work with no further explanation, disvaluing CYB3R's effort Now I understand what you mean. Thanks for explaining.

francescortiz commented on 2014-08-30 07:52 (UTC)

orschiro, compare the difference between saying: "Why don't you shut up?" against saying: "The way he proposed the PKGBUILD didn't look nice because he was proposing to replace someelse's work with no further explanation, disvaluing CYB3R's effort. Now that CharlesAtum made clear what improvements were added it looks nice again. I hope I made myself clear. If not, this shouldn't be discused here." After all, I proposed to take this conversation somewhere else in both cases.

orschiro commented on 2014-08-30 07:25 (UTC)

@francescortiz I don't understand why this is interrogating. He proposed a concrete PKGBUILD update.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-08-30 00:52 (UTC)

Sorry for this, I usually ask things when I try to be polite. Anyway, The PKGBUILD I posted fix some namcap warnings, removes the x86_64-linux-gnu, changes tibtiff4 to libtiff, along with some other things. Feel free to use it as you think it fits. Also I remember reading somewhere on lwks website about the need of a "number" for each machine on the same license. I wanted to know if it really is still needed on the install file. Sorry again for saying things in questions.

francescortiz commented on 2014-08-29 22:55 (UTC)

CharlesAtum, this is not your interrogation room. Make proposals if you have any.

<deleted-account> commented on 2014-08-29 15:13 (UTC)

@stjhimy Could you replace your PKGBUILD with this one: https://gist.github.com/CharlesAtum/ff75efddc2ddec383127 ? Also, could you check if creating that random number after install is really needed and explain why?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 18 Next › Last »