Package Details: plymouth-git 24.004.60.r34.gedc7c3ea-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/plymouth-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: plymouth-git
Description: Graphical boot splash screen (git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/Plymouth/
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Conflicts: plymouth
Provides: plymouth
Submitter: PirateJonno
Maintainer: Taijian
Last Packager: Taijian
Votes: 274
Popularity: 0.000689
First Submitted: 2009-05-02 09:53 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-17 07:42 (UTC)

Required by (175)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 51 Next › Last »

Maxr commented on 2012-04-29 15:27 (UTC)

encrypt_install got a wrong checksum

ricardofunke commented on 2012-04-04 00:19 (UTC)

systemd isn't build by this package, it's installed as a dependency

h31 commented on 2012-04-03 22:30 (UTC)

Did you tried to use --enable-plymouth option while building systemd? Are there any difference with it?

ricardofunke commented on 2012-04-03 19:32 (UTC)

Thankyou for you comment GNRS. I must understand a lot more about systemd, I already doing some efforts to solve this problem. If someone already knows how to fix it or want to make a try, feel free to send me your suggestions

GNRS commented on 2012-04-03 13:15 (UTC)

I get a black screen between the plymouth splash screen and GDM. I think it is due to GDM loading (it is not a black screen with a blinking cursor, it's just an empty screen). I wonder if it is normal and whether it is possible to tell plymouth to wait until GDM is completeley loaded so there is no black screen between them. Any ideas?

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-17 13:14 (UTC)

Ok, done! Thank you guys!

Det commented on 2012-02-17 02:11 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure people got initscripts installed. The ones who don't obviously use systemd (otherwise they couldn't even boot). Just put both to optdeps.

ImNtReal commented on 2012-02-16 20:51 (UTC)

It seems like there should be a common provides between the two. It's not that big of a deal for me to remove the dependency when I update, and it's probably safe to assume anyone willing to go to native systemd can probably do the same.

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-16 20:39 (UTC)

But, on reflection, if I do so, both systemd and initscripts will be optdepends and this package require that one of them is installed on the system in order to work. So, I think I prefer to keep it with what is working better, what do you think?

ricardofunke commented on 2012-02-16 20:34 (UTC)

Oh, you're right! I'll do that, thanks!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 51 Next › Last »